[Dr. Franklin]

From you CNN story:
However, without information on the quality of the genome, the raw data or how the analyses were done, it is not possible to assess the assertions made in the documentary, according to Pontus Skoglund, senior group leader of the Ancient Genomics Laboratory at the Francis Crick Institute in London.

Then this study didn't find that Hitler had any Jewish DNA while it is known that he had one Jewish grandparent. Even so, what if Hitler's body double was his cousin? Then the DNA would be similar to other family members. Too many witnesses claim to have seen Hitler after the event to accept this as credible.

[GingisK]

Too many witnesses claim to have seen Hitler after the event to accept this as credible.

I find it odd that people will accept this testimony from a fairly small number of people, but not the testimony of thousands of credible witnesses of UFO matters. It seems to based upon what they want to believe rather than the preponderance of the evidence.

Same thing with the Apollo landings.

[mass55th]

"Then this study didn't find that Hitler had any Jewish DNA while it is known that he had one Jewish grandparent."

It wasn't known for certain at the time that Hitler had a Jewish grandparent. It was only speculation and rumor. There were also rumors at the time about Himmler having Jewish ancestry. The fact is that no Jewish DNA showed up in his DNA sequencing, only Austrian German ancestry. If a grandfather of his had indeed been Jewish, because of the close proximity in the family line, it would have showed up in his DNA.

[mass55th]

"Too many witnesses claim to have seen Hitler after the event to accept this as credible."

Sure, because eyewitnesses are always accurate. That's why if you ask 10 people who saw the same incident to describe the perp, you'll likely come up with 10 different answers.