Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brian Harpole - Groundbreaking Evidence From Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security | SRS #254
Youtube ^ | 11 18 2025 | Shawn Ryan

Posted on 11/18/2025 2:27:30 AM PST by cuz1961

click here to read article


Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2025 2:27:30 AM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

What’s the new evidence?


2 posted on 11/18/2025 2:34:33 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

I was hoping for a synopsis. A brief summary.

So I don’t have to waste almost three hours listening to it.

The first two minutes is garbage. Maybe they get to something real eventually?


3 posted on 11/18/2025 2:36:20 AM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Three hours? Seriously? Whats the Cliffs notes version of this?


4 posted on 11/18/2025 2:40:21 AM PST by know.your.why
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

I find it funny that the guy who admitted he shot Charlie Kirk is the exact guy FReepers are trying to get exonerated.


5 posted on 11/18/2025 3:05:56 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I don’t see anything in the article or in replies to it that would tend to support your assertion.


6 posted on 11/18/2025 3:16:39 AM PST by equaviator (Nobody's perfect. That's why they put pencils on erasers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
I find it funny that the guy who admitted he shot Charlie Kirk is the exact guy FReepers are trying to get exonerated.

Exactly. It couldn’t be the sodomite assassins that have been shooting up schools, shooting the president, and killing our children.
7 posted on 11/18/2025 3:22:52 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

was hoping for a synopsis. A brief summary.

So I don’t have to waste almost three hours listening to it.

The first two minutes is garbage. Maybe they get to something real eventually?

/

Sorry.

You don’t seem very interested and seem to be pre conceived that the interview is garbage.

If it’s too much trouble for you don’t listen , but please don’t gripe and expect others to do the work for you.

/-)

Shawn doesn’t do drive by interviews , and they are usually worth the time he spends .

Ymmv.

And that’s ok.


8 posted on 11/18/2025 3:34:17 AM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961; All
I've been using GPT 5.1 to analyze the video transcript. In response to the requests by some here for a summary, I asked for one and here it is:
A senior member of Charlie Kirk’s security detail recounts the shooting from his perspective: the security plan, the failure of promised police drone overwatch, the immediate response to the gunshot, the medical efforts, and the evacuation to the hospital. He confirms there was an autopsy, explains the bullet’s internal path and why there was no exit wound, and debunks viral theories about explosive microphones, hand-signal “codes,” or inside involvement. He criticizes the FBI and institutions for withholding information, which he says has fueled conspiracies and led to his team being doxxed, but he does not allege a cover-up—only excessive secrecy. Overall, it’s an eyewitness account aimed at clarifying facts and countering misinformation.

9 posted on 11/18/2025 3:34:50 AM PST by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

The conspiracy people will be disappointed.


10 posted on 11/18/2025 3:38:51 AM PST by Nifty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Bullet-Point Summary of the Shawn Ryan Show Interview with Brian Harpool
(Head of Charlie Kirk’s security detail on the day he was assassinated – Sept 10, 2025)New /

Previously Unreported Information RevealedUVU Police Chief Long explicitly told Harpool on Monday (2 days before the event): “I got you covered” regarding student roof access on the Sorenson Center directly in front of the stage. Roof was never secured; shooter used that exact building.

Text message screenshot exists showing Harpool asking for roof control or his own man posted → Chief Long replied “I got you covered.” Harpool is willing to release it.

No drones were used despite Orem PD having a professional drone unit and a mutual-aid agreement with UVU PD. UVU never requested them.

Event location was forced by UVU – only permitted spot on campus; no other options given despite 180° elevated exposure.

Security team had 12–13 men (upped from normal 8–9) because of general heightened risk; still more manpower than the 6 campus officers assigned.

Shooter’s vantage point was an extremely narrow “loophole” (≈7–10 ft wide); 3 m left or right = no shot. Harpool questions whether Tyler Robinson found it by pure luck in seconds or had rehearsed it.

Bullet struck vertebrae, shattered C-spine, fragmented – no exit wound (explains lack of exit and why no intact bullet was recovered).

Autopsy was performed (contrary to online claims). Harpool personally pushed for immediate autopsy at hospital with VP on the phone.

Crime scene was repaved extraordinarily fast – Harpool repeatedly asked why; suggests FOIA the university for the work-order timeline.

Security team never received any specific intel about Israel/Mossad threats to Charlie Kirk despite online rumors.

No hand/arm signals were used by the detail the day of the shooting (debunks “stand-down” conspiracy).

Key Timeline & Tactical DetailsAdvance work began ~2 weeks prior; team physically built all barricades, tape lines, vehicle barricades themselves.

Concentric-ring setup with plain-clothes crowd spotters actively hunting pre-incident indicators.

Immediate response: ~5 seconds to cover Charlie, ~15–16 seconds to initial wound packing and decision to exfil.
Exfil: Car prepped instantly (doors open), Charlie carried/dragged into SUV; door never closed; Harpool rode with butt out the open door applying direct pressure while teammate held him in at 80–100 mph.
~36 ft of gauze + multiple hemostatic 4×4s packed into neck wound en route.

Hospital: Team arrived covered in blood, wheeled Charlie in themselves, Harpool cut shirt off in trauma bay, then stood guard outside the room.

Major Conspiracy Theories Directly Debunked by Harpool

Explosive microphone / projectile: No flash, no char, no burn marks on shirt or skin.

Hand signals / stand-down: No tactical hand signals used; only casual gestures.

Hidden trap door / tunnel: Never existed.

Inside job (security team or Turning Point): “To my death – no.”

No autopsy: Confirmed done; Harpool demanded it immediately.

SD card deletion / hidden camera: Video team (not security) pulled cards; all handed to FBI.

Harpool’s Remaining Unanswered QuestionsExact timeline of when shooter accessed the roof and how he immediately found the one narrow firing loophole.

Shooter’s phone / tower records, Google Earth history, coworkers, possible accomplices.

Why crime scene was repaved within days (FOIA the university).

Why no public release of basic forensic facts (bullet path, vertebrae strike, fragmentation) that would kill most conspiracy theories overnight.

Tone & Takeaway from HarpoolDeep frustration at sensationalized lies hurting his men and their families (doxxing, stolen credit cards, etc.).

Believes more transparency from FBI/UVU would have prevented 95% of the conspiracy ecosystem.

“The truth is like a lion – set it free and it will defend itself.”

Still grieving; broke down multiple times describing

Charlie’s wound and Erica Kirk’s screams.

In short: A highly professional team did everything within legal and contractual limits, was explicitly assured rooftop coverage that never materialized, responded heroically, and is now being destroyed online while institutions hide behind “jury contamination” excuses.


11 posted on 11/18/2025 3:40:09 AM PST by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Here’s one point addressed.

33m 31 s

” Q.Do any of you guys have ties to any intelligence agencies or mossad.

A. No. “

.


12 posted on 11/18/2025 3:41:37 AM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nifty

None of this was said under oath.


13 posted on 11/18/2025 3:43:22 AM PST by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

Thank you and nifty, for your efforts.

Actually I had just started to listen to this after I posted this, and am only to about 35 minutes into it.

But I know I couldn’t have provided as detailed a synopsis.

I’m going to finish watching it,

Not cuz I don’t trust chat gp AI,

just that I don’t trust chat bot AI /-)

It’s probably accurate,

Trust but verify ya know ?

But I DO appreciate you two putting out the effort to post what you have.

Thank you.


14 posted on 11/18/2025 3:49:47 AM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nifty
The conspiracy people will be disappointed.

Candace is their first and last word on this incident. She tweeted yesterday a "huge" development she would announce would "change everything." Meaning, more grift incoming.

15 posted on 11/18/2025 3:49:53 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Thank you Rooster !!!


16 posted on 11/18/2025 3:52:21 AM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Charlie Kirk came to her in a dream


17 posted on 11/18/2025 4:00:07 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Yur welcome.:-)


18 posted on 11/18/2025 4:00:37 AM PST by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

44m 39 s

Pretty much dismissed Israeli or mossad culpability.

Possibilities are infinite

Probabilities aren’t.

Charlie was vehemently
hated by nuts on the left

Israel didn’t off Charlie cuz of how he felt or what he thought about Israel.

( cuz61 opinion incoming

,besides almost everybody hates Israel, Charlie was the least of their worries )

Is it possible mossad did it ? anything is possible

Is it probable they did it ? No. Way more probable the nutty left did it.


19 posted on 11/18/2025 4:11:14 AM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Thanks for posting that. While I listen to Shawn occasionally…three hours is quite the commitment some days.


20 posted on 11/18/2025 4:13:01 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson