[equaviator]

I don’t see anything in the article or in replies to it that would tend to support your assertion.

[ConservativeMind]

There have been multiple threads posted in the past couple days in which the claim is that the alleged, admitted shooter, is innocent. The claim is that the Furry-loving shooter had a poor gun to kill someone with and that Charlie was shot from behind, not in front, and that there was a camera behind Charlie that caught this all.

The FReeper had videos of AI generated stuff showing this, as stated in the comments from others.

The FReeper’s claim in this was that it was a professional hit and the person in jail was setup.