What’s the new evidence?
I was hoping for a synopsis. A brief summary.
So I don’t have to waste almost three hours listening to it.
The first two minutes is garbage. Maybe they get to something real eventually?
Three hours? Seriously? Whats the Cliffs notes version of this?
I find it funny that the guy who admitted he shot Charlie Kirk is the exact guy FReepers are trying to get exonerated.
A senior member of Charlie Kirk’s security detail recounts the shooting from his perspective: the security plan, the failure of promised police drone overwatch, the immediate response to the gunshot, the medical efforts, and the evacuation to the hospital. He confirms there was an autopsy, explains the bullet’s internal path and why there was no exit wound, and debunks viral theories about explosive microphones, hand-signal “codes,” or inside involvement. He criticizes the FBI and institutions for withholding information, which he says has fueled conspiracies and led to his team being doxxed, but he does not allege a cover-up—only excessive secrecy. Overall, it’s an eyewitness account aimed at clarifying facts and countering misinformation.
Reads like a resumé. Where’s the beef?
You failed to post the important part
Charlie was murdered over MONEY! Someone or more likely someones was embezzling MILLIONS and Charlie was about to find out who.
“They couldn’t allow THAT! AND as a result MILLIONS more money for them to steal came in in response to Charlie’s death.
Candace Owens’ Monday podcast.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQjCAsfoXEE&t=2720s
Wolves and Finance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBaC2c-s2Pk
This article is a F-ing waste of time!
I believe this to be untrue:
“No tactical hand signals used; only casual gestures”