was hoping for a synopsis. A brief summary.
So I don’t have to waste almost three hours listening to it.
The first two minutes is garbage. Maybe they get to something real eventually?
/
Sorry.
You don’t seem very interested and seem to be pre conceived that the interview is garbage.
If it’s too much trouble for you don’t listen , but please don’t gripe and expect others to do the work for you.
/-)
Shawn doesn’t do drive by interviews , and they are usually worth the time he spends .
Ymmv.
And that’s ok.
I watched the entire video, I appreciate you posting about it, I thought about posting something last night, but the inevitable comments by some on FR wanting you to give them a Reader’s Digest version of the interview because they don’t want to spend the time to learn for themselves, I didn’t want to deal with, it’s like they feel entitled for someone to spend 3 hours watching the interview then spoon feed it to them because they can’t be bothered with doing it themselves, it gets really old, really fast.
Thnaks for the effort.
Wow.
It’s YOUR responsibility as the poster to post something useful and informative.
A link to a 3 hour video (according to comments) simply does not qualify.
Such a lazy posting, absent anything related to the headline whatsoever.
This isn’t just a ‘fail’…it is rather pathetic. And the rhetoric. WTF?
Just wow, dude. This post merits getting pulled.
No one is going to watch a 2 hour and 45 minute video without knowing if it's worth watching.
That’s a dumb response. I don’t spend three hours on anything I haven’t been convinced is worth my time, either on my own or by someone else. A request for a synopsis or bottom line is not unreasonable.
Give us a hint! Come on. Aw nevermind