Google AI claims when asked that it was written by people with diverse political opinions. How many of its developers were on the political right versus the left?

I cannot say how many of AI claims were written by people with diverse political opinions, but based upon a 2020 report by CNBC

[1]

on “The most liberal and conservative tech companies, ranked by employees’ political donations,” then, as with most tech companies, we see Google as overwhelming liberal:

Alphabet (Google) Democrats - $5,437,048 (88%), Republicans - $766,920 (12%)

Some others from that source:

Netflix Democrats - $340,485 (98%), Republicans - $7,124 (2%)

Nvidia Democrats - $154,466 (93%), Republicans - $11,673 (7%)

Adobe Democrats - $401,937 (93%), Republicans - $28,137 (7%)

IBM Democrats - $1,496,234 (90%), Republicans - $163,804 (10%)

Using a subject that results in clearly opposing responses, I can provide evidence that is indicative of Google’s AI and search engine being biased.

Search:

Negative effects of homosexual relations (also heterosexual fornication) - Physical, Psychological, Financial and Spiritual on Google

(without quotes or and in quotes), versus Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yandex, Brave, etc.

Google does not (and never has in months of testing) even list the Blogger (owned by Google) page with that actual title in its results (the actual link to that non-commercial substantive page is not provided here as Quora may judge that as being “spam”), and Google’s AI states in its lead:

“There is no scientific consensus on negative effects of homosexual relations, and scientific studies generally find no inherent negative physical, psychological, financial, or spiritual effects of homosexuality itself. However, the term "fornication" (unmarried heterosexual intercourse) is associated with spiritual beliefs that view it negatively, and some studies have found correlations between certain sexual behaviors, including promiscuity or a high number of partners, and negative health or psychological outcomes…
No inherent negative effects: Scientific consensus does not support the idea that homosexual relations themselves cause negative psychological or physical effects.”

Note that this not only denies extensive CDC data on negative effects of homosexual relations, but it chooses to focus on “homosexuality itself,” as if that is not related to sexual activity.

Then, Google’s AI defines "fornication" as ‘unmarried heterosexual intercourse, and which it states that just “some studies” have found correlations btwn the practice and negative health.

In contrast, a search on that title in Bing results in the page with that actual title being its top search result (as does DuckDuckGo, and Brave and Yandex lists it as #2), and its summation itself cites negative effects.

So what kind of a diet have the voracious readers of AI been placed on?

In my experience with perplexity.ai, more truthful than Google search results on ideological issues.

As regards such from the MSM with its promotion of abortion, homosex, liberal socialism etc. while denigrating opposition,

"Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men." (Hosea 10:13)

But as regards the word of God,

But thou, son of man, hear what I say unto thee; Be not thou rebellious like that rebellious house: open thy mouth, and eat that I give thee. (Ezekiel 2:8)

And he said unto me, Son of man, cause thy belly to eat, and fill thy bowels with this roll that I give thee. Then did I eat it; and it was in my mouth as honey for sweetness. (Ezekiel 3:3)

Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O Lord God of hosts. (Jeremiah 15:16)

And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey. (Revelation 10:9)

But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. (Matthew 4:4)

Therefore said the disciples one to another, Hath any man brought him ought to eat? Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work. (John 4:33-34)

As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. (John 6:57)

It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. (John 6:63)

As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby: (1 Peter 2:2)

And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come... (Hebrews 6:5)

...nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained. (1 Timothy 4:6)

Of course, having eaten the fruit of lies includes believing "the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit and life" refers to a wafer of bread consecrated by a celibate priest as a sacrifice for sins and as spiritual food.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.