To: nickcarraway
I wouldn’t worry about other women if I was sure my hubbie wasn’t inclined to wander.
2 posted on
10/10/2025 11:30:47 AM PDT by
Twotone
( What's the difference between a politician & a flying pig? The letter "F.")
To: nickcarraway
Can both ‘Key Ingredients” usually be found on her chest?
To: nickcarraway
NSDT. No s* dick Tracey.. It took a study to figure this out??? I had this figured out before I was 16.. women are animals.
4 posted on
10/10/2025 11:32:58 AM PDT by
Ikeon
(Kill me, and I'll become more powerful than you could ever imagine. )
To: nickcarraway
I'm just going to leave this here.
5 posted on
10/10/2025 11:35:39 AM PDT by
Sirius Lee
("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
To: nickcarraway
I find it ironic that the “short term dating strategy” was signaled by the rival woman dressing proactively.
Obviously, that’s true. Women who intentionally dress that way are looking for attention — from someone. Anyone who has been to a bar knows this.
But all the feminist writers says this obvious truth is untrue, and we must ignore common sense.
8 posted on
10/10/2025 11:40:45 AM PDT by
MeanWestTexan
(Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
To: nickcarraway
As an observer of life, women, men, and the world - and I'm speaking as an early 60s woman - here's what I've noticed.
Men are attracted to women who are fit and not overweight, and present young, and by that I mean, yes, in looks but also in spirit ... and from the men I know the spirit counts more than the looks.
Post-menopausal women often come across as accepting of age and infirmities, letting the weight pack on, acting like oh (fill in the blank) is for the younger set.
Even if they're not yet "old" they present as "old", having thrown in the towel on appearance and staying fit.
To: nickcarraway
In other news - water is wet
11 posted on
10/10/2025 11:50:18 AM PDT by
atc23
To: nickcarraway
Probably not a great idea to ponder too deeply the circumstances that led to your conception.
To: nickcarraway
14 posted on
10/10/2025 11:56:09 AM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: nickcarraway; All
I wonder who paid to produce the obvious conclusions in this ‘study’
20 posted on
10/10/2025 12:18:09 PM PDT by
notdownwidems
(Washington D.C. has become the enemy of free people everywhere!)
To: nickcarraway
I don’t think a study needed to be conducted to arrive at those results. It’s basically, “Well, duh!”
23 posted on
10/10/2025 12:31:14 PM PDT by
MayflowerMadam
(It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
To: nickcarraway
Past 30 a woman is more likely to poach another woman’s man. Not because she is interested in a relationship, but because she is seeking validation as an attractive woman.
The irony is the farther ages past 30, the more vulnerable she becomes to the predations of married lotharios.
28 posted on
10/10/2025 12:57:57 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.)
To: nickcarraway
31 posted on
10/10/2025 1:23:06 PM PDT by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 "/!i!! &@$%&*(@ -')
To: nickcarraway
I think their next study will reveal that water is wet.
33 posted on
10/10/2025 1:29:09 PM PDT by
bort
To: nickcarraway
I take it the authors of this study don’t date much.
34 posted on
10/10/2025 1:46:21 PM PDT by
Organic Panic
('Was I molested. I think so' - Ashley Biden in response to her father joining her in the shower.)
To: nickcarraway
“ their apparent willingness to compete for men and their physical ability to attract them.”
Duh.
L
36 posted on
10/10/2025 3:14:50 PM PDT by
Lurker
( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.l)
To: nickcarraway
Some women like to go after men in a relationship.
Every time I was dating or in a serious relationship, other women would come on to me.
When single...crickets.
Must be the scent of a woman! /groan
37 posted on
10/10/2025 3:31:04 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
To: nickcarraway
two distinct factors: their apparent willingness to compete for men and their physical ability to attract them.They needed a “study” to figure this out? Who was paying for it—USAID?
40 posted on
10/10/2025 6:05:14 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(“Columbus Day! We're back, Italians! We love the Italians, okay?” Trump said. )
To: nickcarraway
41 posted on
10/10/2025 6:07:34 PM PDT by
Varsity Flight
( "War by 🙏 the prophesies set before you." ) I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite warriors. 10.5.6.5 These Days)
To: nickcarraway
Scientists have long recognized that women actively compete with one another to attract desirable partners. What kind of "scientist" got paid to discover that?
42 posted on
10/10/2025 8:41:20 PM PDT by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite its unfashionability)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson