Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian Govt Prepares to Disarm Civilians
Armstrong Economics ^ | 2 Oct 25 | Martin Armstrong

Posted on 10/01/2025 8:45:15 AM PDT by delta7

There has never been a positive outcome when the government sets out to disarm the people. Authoritarian states are the inevitable result. Certain semi-automatic weapons were prohibited in March 2025, with a one-year amnesty period for lawful gun owners to surrender their rifles through a buyback program. The government claims the buyback program is completely voluntary “with the expectation they will comply,” according to Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree.

Anandasangaree does not believe the Canadian government is equipped to disarm citizens, as revealed in a leaked audio clip. “I just don’t think municipal police services have the resources to do this,” the minister says.

The minister claims a gun lobbyist leaked the audio in which he was speaking in jest. On the audio, the minister admits that gun owners are clearly losing money with a C$400 flat rate compensation for each gun surrendered. The man asks if he would be considered a criminal for refusing to deactivate or surrender his guns. “If the police enforce it, yes,” the minister states.

Anandasangaree admits the program is flawed, but speaking with Mark Carney is a moot point. “We’ve had all these conversations. Like I’ve had for the last four months, it’s been like constant, constant discussions on this to see what’s next, right? And the conclusion is let’s finish this because we committed to it in the campaign,” he reveals, mentioning earlier in the call he is simply following orders.

“No, you’re going to turn me into a criminal Gary, because you know I’m not gonna turn mine in. I’m telling you right now. I refused it,” the associate rebuked, adding, “Well, no, but the police will come to my house at some point, because what’s registered. They know who I am, they know where I live, they know where they are, they’re locked up in my safe, I’m gonna refuse to hand ’em in. They’re gonna come in, rip open my safe, right? Take those firearms and put me in handcuffs.” Gary stated he would bail him out if that happened.

Disgraced former PM Justin Trudeau attempted to implement a buyback program on May 1, 2020, but did not go as far as revoking gun licenses and confiscating guns. The current program is capped at a budget of C$742 million. Money is not the concern here. Canadians have had the right to legally own arms for 243 years, but suddenly the government decided they no longer deserve the right.

Gun confiscation veiled as gun control. A voluntary program will soon become mandatory. Failure to comply will result in criminal charges. Law-abiding citizens are rarely the culprits behind gun crime. The criminals on the streets and in office will still have guns.

Anandasangaree admitted that the government has yet to decide what they will do if the majority fail to comply, and after COVID, there’s valid reason to believe that most will cave.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: anandasangaree; banglist; canada; confiscation; gunconfiscation; gunregistration; guns; northerncuba; registration; snownazis

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Flag_This
You must remember that prominent among the first settlers of English Canada were Loyalists who opposed American independence. After the American victory, many of these pro-British colonials moved to Ontario and the Maritime Provinces.
21 posted on 10/01/2025 9:17:26 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
It may be a good thing that he does not appear to be capable of chasing down someone refusing to give up their firearms. Not personally. Since my post I also thought that this putz thinks that this laws should be okay with Canadian citizens because he does not think that the police will not have the resources to enforce the law

Funny thin is, what laws are enforce in any jurisdiction is always a choice of the people in charge.

In the US in some places laws against illegal immigration have been ignored while finical laws have been selectively enforced against political opponents.

Such assurances do not bring me comfort.

22 posted on 10/01/2025 9:21:01 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

On the night before the battles, several riders, including Paul Revere, William Dawes and Samuel Prescott, warned area militias of the British plans and approaching British Army expedition from Boston.
Alternate History
As the British regulars advanced, American militia leader Capt. John Parker, veteran of the French & Indian wars, met British lieutenant Sutherland on the commons and said,
“As you can see, we’re unarmed. We lost our firearms in boating accidents.”
Lt. Sutherland boxed Parker’s ears and frog marched the Yankee doodles to their hidden rifles, lecturing them severely.


23 posted on 10/01/2025 9:21:04 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: delta7

Behind the scenes, the CCP and the WEF run Canada.

Both of these entities are working together to make Canada the “showplace” of their plans.


24 posted on 10/01/2025 9:23:48 AM PDT by datura (Eventually, the Lord and the Truth will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Only a fool shows his hand before all the bets are in.


25 posted on 10/01/2025 9:25:44 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: delta7

No protests?
WTH is wrong with Canadians?


26 posted on 10/01/2025 9:32:45 AM PDT by right way right (“May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

The proper response to this “taking” of property, is revolutionary action.


27 posted on 10/01/2025 9:43:40 AM PDT by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Weapons need to be given back, in well organized rounds, and properly spaced citizens.


28 posted on 10/01/2025 9:46:03 AM PDT by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

I read someplace that Martin Armstrong is a convicted felon, prohibited from owning firearms.


29 posted on 10/01/2025 9:47:57 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

IBTG

IBTS
——————
He is not fetching lately, or he finally started to read Socrates’s forecasts, which are ringing true everyday…..OR he was banned/ suspended for good….


30 posted on 10/01/2025 9:57:55 AM PDT by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: right way right

“WTH is wrong with Canadians?”

Too culturally close to England and France.


31 posted on 10/01/2025 10:19:16 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: delta7

WEXIT. Hope there’s serious talk about Western provinces joining the U.S.


32 posted on 10/01/2025 10:52:43 AM PDT by Made In The USA (One and Two and Three and Four and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7
There has never been a positive outcome when the government sets out to disarm the people.

the article could have stopped right there
33 posted on 10/01/2025 11:46:52 AM PDT by wafflehouse ("there was a third possibility that we hadn't even counted upon" -Alice's Restaurant Massacree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

We do not want all of Canada. The Eastern half of Canada is like California… flaming libs.


34 posted on 10/01/2025 12:21:29 PM PDT by Cobra64 (ECommon sense isn’t common anymore. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7; All

Buyback? How can the government “buy back” something it never owned. Words used to have meaning. Another incomprehensible expression is “American democracy.” The word “democracy” does not exist in the Constitution but the overwhelmingly stupid among us haven’t figured out how to read the Constitution. Section Four, Article Four.


35 posted on 10/01/2025 12:26:26 PM PDT by Cobra64 (ECommon sense isn’t common anymore. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

3]

Criminal conviction
In 1999, Japanese fraud investigators accused Armstrong of collecting money from Japanese investors, improperly commingling these funds with funds from other investors, and using the fresh money to cover losses he had incurred while trading.[13] United States prosecutors called it a three-billion-dollar Ponzi scheme.[14] Allegedly assisting Armstrong in his scheme was the Republic New York Corporation, which produced false account statements to reassure Armstrong’s investors. In 2001, the bank agreed to pay US$606 million as restitution for its part in the scandal.[14]

Armstrong was indicted in 1999 and ordered by Judge Richard Owen to turn over fifteen million dollars in gold bars and antiquities bought with the fund’s money; the list included bronze helmets and a bust of Julius Caesar.[15][16] Armstrong produced some of the items but claimed the others were not in his possession; this led to several contempt of court charges brought by the SEC and the CFTC, for which he served seven years in jail until he reached a plea bargain with federal prosecutors.[17][18][19] Under the terms of the agreement, Armstrong admitted to deceiving corporate investors and improperly commingling client funds—actions that according to prosecutors resulted in commodities losses of more than seven hundred million dollars—and was sentenced to five years in prison.[20][15]

He was released from federal custody on 2 September 2011 after serving a total of eleven years behind bars.[21][22]

The case against Armstrong was finally closed in 2017, with the distribution of about $80 million to claim holders by the receiver, according to court filings.[23] Armstrong appealed the refusal of the receiver to transport his remaining possessions from storage lockers in New York and Pennsylvania to him in Florida, but the appeal failed in 2019. Concerning his felony conviction, Armstrong is “unrepentant”, according to Bloomberg.[1]

Hidden rare coins cache
In 2014, a day laborer sold a box of 58 rare coins to a Philadelphia thrift shop for $6,000, which he said he had found while clearing out the basement of a house in New Jersey. Three years later, in 2017, when the thrift shop announced they were to auction the coins—actually valued at $2.5 million, Armstrong came forward to declare himself the rightful owner. He claimed that he had hidden the coins in his mother’s old house to take them “off the books” in anticipation of the public offering of his firm. The thrift shop sued Armstrong, asking the court to declare the thrift shop as rightful owners while Armstrong counter-sued, also seeking ownership. In 2019, the US government learned about the coins and claimed them as part of the treasure hoard Armstrong had refused to hand over in 1999, and for which he had served seven years in jail for contempt. In addition to rare coins, the treasure hoard, valued at $12.9 million, included 102 gold bars, 699 gold coins, and an ancient bust of Julius Caesar.[24][25]

Armstrong was deposed and, according to Receiver Alan M. Cohen, Armstrong admitted hiding the coins. However, Armstrong’s attorneys said in a court filing that Armstrong did not make this admission. The auction house now possesses the coins and the US government has filed suit to take possession.[24][25]

Wiki


36 posted on 10/02/2025 7:27:27 AM PDT by TexasGator (The 750 hp Florida Gnat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This
If the choice is complete subjugation, or ruination, a significant % will say “eff it, let’s go.”

Nah, they will relinquish. Americans prefer peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom.

37 posted on 10/02/2025 8:15:58 AM PDT by dware (Americans prefer peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson