Posted on 09/11/2025 8:48:40 AM PDT by RandFan
@OANN
“One bullet. A long rifle. A man from the roof. Does this sound familiar?”
@RogerJStoneJr tells @mattgaetz this was not random. It was a professional political assassination attempt.
Stone warns the attack could have been prevented, and says Americans deserve answers about Butler and West Palm Beach.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
However, there is considerable evidence of planning. For instance, although the shooter certainly did not intend to target the neck, his aim was good enough. This means he must have practiced at that range, once he explored the site beforehand and determined the distance. He must have spent some time at a 200 yd range sighting in the scope. That, and his prior visit to the rooftop to assure he knew the path there and away, cannot have gone unnoticed by someone.
“One bullet. A long rifle. A man from the roof. Does this sound familiar?”
Sure. This guy copied what had been successful before.
I don’t think it was a prof. “hit”. I think the proof it wasn’t, is that he threw the gun in the woods.
“Stone warns the attack could have been prevented, and says Americans deserve answers about Butler and West Palm Beach.”
Palm Beach especially had connections to Ukraine.
Okay. I’ll say it if you won’t. The ADL and jews are financing Marxist movements and thereby are attacking white conservatives. They fully support BLM and antifa financially and politically.
Macho MAGA Man
zotted, thanks for playing.
Intentional misdirection is a sign of a plot not “proof that it wasn't”. Follow the money. Who had the most to lose if Charlie Kirk kept hammering his often-repeated Ukrainian grift message into President Trumps ear?
Kirk had also signalled his support for releasing the full, unredacted Epstein client list.
“Intentional misdirection is a sign of a plot not “proof that it wasn’t”.”
You’re giving him too much credit. And they got a lot of evidence from what he left behind.
200 yards from an elevated position with the target immobile. Any deer hunter could take that shot.
In trying to murder DJTrump Jill went dime-store and hired a little TWOT with a crappy rifle not good at 100 yards.
How about someone just taking a page from the Butler attempt on Trump?
Get up on a roof, good line of sight, no Secret Service, no long range security at the event.
Zizian, trans ex-military, edgelord...
In that video he stated the obvious known facts about the ADL... Many others have been pointing out the same thing for years. That did not get him killed.
When Charlie mentions the “Jewish Community” in that video he is referring to the Bolshevik JINO’s in the USA who are so prominent in the Democrat Party. Nearly ALL of those JINO’s are atheist, they do not attend a synagogue, they do not read the Torah, they are Jewish In Name Only.
The Anti-Defamation League are notoriously left-wing socialist. They support ANYTHING that breaks down a nationalist society or movement (i.e. MAGA).
Charlie Kirk was NEVER antisemitic. He fully supported Israel and it’s right to exist. Charlie knew that the greatest threat to Israel were from the self loathing Jews in America.
Regarding my reply, Post 21, another lead to follow is that the shooter must have visited rooftop very recently before the event, or at least after the pavilion Charlie Kirk was set up. Otherwise, how could he know the best location and the range? if they say that they have video of his entering the stairwell to the roof and escaping from the roof after the shooting, those same cameras would have recorded his prior visit. It is a lot of spade work, but somewhere in those earlier recordings they may find the shooter without his disguise, or in different clothing, perhaps entering or leaving an identifiable vehicle. Tracing him back from other nearby camera feeds on that prior occasion, both coming and going, is very likely to be fruitful.
I heard he was the perfect blend of age, intellect, Rush and Billy Graham.
Any deer hunter could take the shot, but this “hunter” was actually successful with many people all around the target. My best friend's neighbor's niece was one of his employees was very near Charlie Kirk when he was shot. The circumstances, distractions, and the additional people nearby, all moving around made this a difficult shot, not the distance. And then he got away clean.
The guy left evidence meant to misdirect and he got away clean.
I also assume you have no law enforcement experience because you would have mentioned it otherwise. So let me ask this:
If you, as somebody who has no law enforcement experience, is able to figure out this quickly that the evidence left behind truly is intended only for "misdirection" then why assume that the investigation professionals wouldn't figure that out also, and discount it? And wouldn't a professional know that ahead of time?
It was committed by a person who is sick with hatred for us and our country, not a professional. Professionals don’t write on their guns or leave prints on them either.
Sorry Roger you jumped wrong this time
That is well said. I fully agree.
I wouldn't say he got away "clean" considering that they have video of him, and that he left behind his rifle and some biometric data. Given that he was shooting from 200 meters away, it would have been unlikely that anyone would have have caught him immediately because that is just too far outside the security area.
Pretty sure they're going to get this guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.