Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A History of Insane Asylums in California: Rapid Development Amid Early Poverty and Evolution Over Time
Various Web Resources ^ | September 10, 2025 | ProtectOurFreedom & Grok

Posted on 09/10/2025 10:43:59 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom

As an over 50 year resident of California and a history buff, I've been intrigued how quickly the new State of California, at the end of a largely unpopulated and unsettled continent, built insane asylums to care for the mentally ill. The scale, breadth and scope of these institutions in California was incredible. Living in Silicon Valley, we are close to the Agnews State Hospital, one of the first mental hospitals in California.

I find the history instructive because of the heinous murder of Iryna Zarutska by Decarlos Brown Jr. and President Trump's call for building new insane asylums.

Below is a brief history of the California mental hospital example starting with statehood in 1850 when the state was small and relatively poor. I find it amazing and incredible how the new state moved so quickly to build institutions for the mentally ill and criminally insane.

We really lost our way in the 1960s and we are paying a horrible price for it.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: asylum; hospital; insane; insaneasylums; mental
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

A History of Insane Asylums in California: Rapid Development and Evolution Over Time

California's journey into statehood in September 1850, fueled by the Gold Rush, brought explosive population growth—from about 15,000 non-Native residents in 1848 to over 90,000 by 1850. This boom also amplified social challenges, including a surge in individuals with mental illnesses, who prior to statehood were often confined in county jails, poorhouses, or even scuttled ships moored in San Francisco Bay. The young state, strapped for cash with a treasury reliant on volatile gold taxes, land sales, and federal grants, faced immense fiscal pressures amid infrastructure demands like roads and schools. Yet, in a bold and rapid move, the legislature made mental health a priority, passing an act in 1851 to create the Insane Asylum of California—the state's first public psychiatric facility.

Early Development: Building Asylums Despite Economic Constraints (1850s–1900)

Stockton was chosen for its central location and 100 acres of donated land from city founder Charles Weber, who outbid rivals like Benicia and Martinez for the state contract. Despite the state's limited resources—no established tax base beyond ad hoc gold levies and borrowing—the facility was constructed swiftly using state appropriations and local labor, opening its doors in July 1853 as the Stockton State Insane Asylum with an initial capacity of about 100 beds. This pioneering institution, initially designed for 100 patients but soon overcrowded, symbolized California's proactive stance: within three years of statehood, it had erected a dedicated state-run hospital for the mentally ill, far outpacing many older Eastern states.

The asylum's success underscored the urgency; by 1853, California's reported insane population had ballooned to over 60, prompting centralized state care over fragmented county systems. Funding challenges persisted—early operations strained the budget, leading to calls for more stable revenues—but the Gold Rush's windfall enabled ongoing support through legislative bonds and taxes. Emboldened, the state expanded rapidly. As Stockton overflowed in the 1870s, Napa State Hospital opened in 1875 on a 1,000-acre site, funded by $500,000 in state bonds despite economic downturns, starting with about 500 beds. Agnews State Hospital followed in 1888 near San Jose with around 400 beds, and Patton State Hospital in 1893 in San Bernardino with about 600 beds, creating a network of four major facilities by century's end.

These institutions, influenced by reformer Dorothea Dix's advocacy for humane "moral treatment," initially emphasized fresh air, labor, and separation from criminals. However, overcrowding (peaking at thousands per site) and underfunding led to scandals, including poor conditions at Stockton. Nonetheless, California's swift investment—pouring scarce resources into brick-and-mortar asylums while building its economy—laid the foundation for a statewide mental health system, a testament to the new state's resolve amid poverty and chaos.

Housing the Criminally Insane: From Makeshift Confinement to Specialized Facilities

In California during the 1850s and beyond, the criminally insane—individuals deemed mentally ill and dangerous due to criminal acts—were initially handled inconsistently due to the state's nascent infrastructure. Before dedicated facilities existed, they were often confined in county jails or makeshift locations like the scuttled ships used as holding pens in San Francisco Bay during the early Gold Rush years. These environments were inadequate, mixing the mentally ill with other prisoners, often in brutal conditions.

With the opening of the Stockton State Insane Asylum in 1853, the state began centralizing care for the mentally ill, including those deemed criminally insane. Stockton, as California's first state-run psychiatric facility, housed a mix of patients, including those committed through criminal proceedings, as courts could order individuals found "insane" during trials to the asylum instead of prison. However, Stockton wasn’t specifically designed for the criminally insane, and its overcrowded, underfunded conditions often led to poor segregation of violent patients.

By the late 19th century, as California’s asylum system expanded, the criminally insane were increasingly directed to specific facilities. Napa State Hospital, opened in 1875, became a primary site for housing such patients, with sections designated for those committed through the criminal justice system. Patton State Hospital, established in 1893 in San Bernardino, later became the state’s primary facility for the criminally insane, explicitly designed to handle "insane criminals" and those found not guilty by reason of insanity. Patton’s secure environment and specialized staff marked a shift toward separating the criminally insane from the general asylum population, reflecting growing recognition of their unique needs.

Until these specialized facilities were fully operational, the criminally insane were often held in the general wards of Stockton or Napa, sometimes in isolated cells or makeshift secure areas, though records note frequent escapes and management challenges due to limited resources. California’s rapid push to build asylums, despite fiscal constraints, gradually enabled more targeted care for the criminally insane, with Patton eventually serving as the cornerstone of this system by the early 20th century.

Comparing Asylums, Beds, and Population Growth: A Quantitative Perspective

Comparing the number of insane asylums (later called state psychiatric hospitals) and their beds to California’s population over time highlights the state's ambitious early investments and later shifts. Data from the 1850s onward shows a pattern of rapid growth followed by a peak and decline, influenced by economic, social, and policy changes.

1850s: Early Statehood

Population: From ~92,597 in 1850 to ~379,994 by 1860.
Asylums: 1 (Stockton, opened 1853 with ~100–300 beds).
Beds per 1,000 people: ~0.1–0.8. This low ratio reflects the new state's constrained resource but underscores its quick action to build despite limited funds.

Late 19th Century: Expansion

Population: ~864,694 in 1880 to ~1,485,053 by 1900.
Asylums: 4 by 1900 (Stockton ~1,000 beds, Napa ~1,500, Agnews ~1,000, Patton ~1,200; total ~3,700–4,700).
Beds per 1,000 people: ~2.5–3.2. Growth in beds outpaced population slightly, driven by bonds and taxes amid stabilizing economy.

Mid-20th Century: Peak Institutionalization

Population: ~10,586,223 by 1950.
Asylums: 10–12 facilities with ~37,000 beds.
Beds per 1,000 people: ~3.5, the historical high, including forensic cases at Patton and Napa.

Modern Era (2020s): Deinstitutionalization

Population: ~39,538,223 in 2020.
Asylums: 5 hospitals with ~6,000–7,000 beds (e.g., Patton 1,527, Napa ~1,200).
Beds per 1,000 people: ~0.16–0.18 (~17.16 per 100,000), above national average but strained by high occupancy and forensic focus. This decline stems from policy shifts to community care, leaving gaps for severe cases.

Conclusion

California's history of insane asylums illustrates a remarkable trajectory: from swiftly building state-run institutions in the new state with limited resources in the 1850s to a mid-20th-century peak and modern deinstitutionalization. Despite early fiscal woes, the state prioritized mental health, expanding facilities and beds relative to population growth while evolving care for the criminally insane from makeshift jails to secure hospitals like Patton. Today, with fewer beds per capita, the system focuses on forensics amid broader community shifts, reflecting ongoing debates on mental health policy.

California Insane Asylums: Population and Bed Comparison by Decade

DecadeCalifornia Population (000)Number of Insane Asylum BedsRatio of Population to Beds (Beds per 1,000 People)
1850s~93 (1850) - 380 (1860)~100–300~0.1–0.8
1880s~865 (1880)~1,900–2,400~2.2–2.8
1900s~1,485 (1900)~3,700–4,700~2.5–3.2
1950s~10,586 (1950)~37,000~3.5
2020s~39,538 (2020)~6,000–7,000~0.16–0.18

Notes: Population data sourced from U.S. Census. Bed estimates for 1850s–1900s based on historical records of Stockton, Napa, Agnews, and Patton State Hospitals. 1950s data reflects peak institutionalization. 2020s data from recent reports. Ratios calculated as beds per 1,000 population. Early decades use ranges due to data variability.



Male Department, Stockton State Hospital


Female Department, Stockton State Hospital


Napa State Hospital


Napa State Hospital


Agnews State Hospital, Santa Clara, CA


Agnews State Hospital, Santa Clara, CA


Southern California State Hospital, Patton, CA.


We've all seen the horrible images of the price we are paying for closing the institutions and letting the insane and addicted live on our streets...

We need to ask ourselves a simple question: Were the state-run hospitals, even with their well-known abuses of patients, worse than what we have today?

1 posted on 09/10/2025 10:43:59 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Left one out:


2 posted on 09/10/2025 10:47:02 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

What about Berkeley?


3 posted on 09/10/2025 10:54:48 AM PDT by EvilCapitalist (Pets are no substitute for children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

Ha.

There is one fully operational mental institution in California:

The California State Capitol Building and Capitol Annex in Sacramento. 😛😜😛

One guy, Gavin something, has been on the loose in other parts of the country. Be on the lookout. 😵


4 posted on 09/10/2025 11:00:56 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Reagan and his Democrats made sure that the criminal insane were turned into the streets. As stupid as his amnesty BS was.

Republicans put all the blame on Democrats.. with good reason, BUT you have to remember that Ronald Reagan is the president who ended locking up LOONS like the one who murdered this innocent young woman!

AI
His administration was instrumental in repealing much of the Mental Health Systems Act of 1980 (MHSA) and funding cuts that contributed to the broader deinstitutionalization movement, which shifted care from large state hospitals to community-based services for all mental health patients, not just those who were criminal.
Reagan’s Role: Reagan’s political efforts, particularly the repeal of the MHSA, were significant in dismantling the federal support for state-funded mental health services.
https://capitolweekly.net/the-republican-who-emptied-the-asylums/

We have to clean out our own house first! Sorry!


5 posted on 09/10/2025 11:03:25 AM PDT by AuntB (Trump is our Ben Franklin - Brilliant, Boisterous, Brave and ALL AMERICAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

Don’t forget the Governors mansion.


6 posted on 09/10/2025 11:04:48 AM PDT by EvilCapitalist (Pets are no substitute for children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

True. Someday it may be cleansed by an exorcist. For now, stay away.


7 posted on 09/10/2025 11:06:39 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Somewhat dated, but valiable reference on mental health laws in CA for anyone interested :

https://calhospital.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/mentalhealth2019_webpreview.pdf


8 posted on 09/10/2025 11:08:29 AM PDT by PsyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Small single-story rowhouses could be built. They might have the space and layout of an RV.

They might get built near Sacramento, Stockton and other places.

If the client takes their meds at the clinic, they might get a $5 bill or 20 quarters for their electric meter.


9 posted on 09/10/2025 11:11:02 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

https://medium.com/iowa-history/a-splendid-piece-of-property-730364843e8b

Before the asylums were the county farms.


10 posted on 09/10/2025 11:12:29 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

LOL...you really did get me laughing out loud, Jeff. Thanks for the chuckle.


11 posted on 09/10/2025 11:12:36 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Thanks for the Reagan perspective, AuntB. I was unaware of that. Good background info.


12 posted on 09/10/2025 11:13:50 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

“the 1981 report of the Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy, chaired by the Reverend Theodore Hesburgh of Notre Dame, which was the inspiration for the 1986 amnesty”

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/more-echoes-last-amnesty-mark-krikorian/


13 posted on 09/10/2025 11:23:51 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom; AuntB

AuntB is parroting the left’s rewrite of history.

It was JFK that started the emptying of the mental hospitals with his 1963 law to take control and funding from the states and shift it to the federal government while emptying the big state hospitals and send them into the communities.


14 posted on 09/10/2025 11:25:14 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“AuntB is parroting the left’s rewrite of history.”

Thanks.

I wasn’t interested in who and how the de-institutionalization got started. All we know is it has been a total disaster, especially when combined with the rot in our school and religious institutions, the rise of mammoth drug cartels, and the Chinese and Mexicans flooding us with drugs.

I was marveling at how from the very start CA handled mental health problems and, when the state did not have a lot of resources or tax base, spent a lot on addressing mental health in the mid 19th century. It’s quite the contrast to the 21st century. Those people 125 years ago would be absolutely appalled and our civic conditions today.


15 posted on 09/10/2025 11:29:38 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

JFK setting out to shutdown the state mental hospitals and federalize mental health broke the system, and that was also during the era when the left started shutting down flop houses and boarding houses where a person could get room and board from perhaps an old lady or two.

That was also the era when the left and the courts were blocking vagrancy laws and being able to force people into mental health care.


16 posted on 09/10/2025 11:36:38 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

No- the problem was then and is now that Demand quickly outstrips Supply. (See my profile link to Jarvis Law). Jail cells fill up quickly as the spillover valve. Every State in the Union built such elaborate facilities in the late 1800s/early 1900s. Check out Chattahoochee Florida, Traverse City,Michigan “Insane Asylums” fit for Royalty back in the day. The Elite influencers at that time had family members who were deemed insane and needed to be removed from Society for whatever reason, but wanted humane treatment...
There is no Good answer to this Evil walking among us. Cain suffered Banishment for his crime of jealous murder against his own innocent brother. Even God couldn’t let him be killed for his punishment. Can such people ever be rehabilitated to the point of trusting them in Society again after their heinous crime? The flatline Zombies, the temporarily insane Crimes of Passion types, the falsely accused fall-guys who are wacky in some unacceptable way, what do? MkUltra for the good of Society?
Should the Guilty mad dogs regardless of whether the Devil made him do it be executed expeditiously and put out of everyone’s misery? Restrictive environments provide protection and monitoring, but is this also Cruel & Inhumane to do to someone for 20, 30, 40 years.
The modern anti-psychotic & anti-depressant drugs have acknowledged “side effects” of homicidal / suicidal ideation. People report these symptoms and want off the drugs and do better. Some who stay on the drugs kill their babies or themselves or innocent others, etc etc. This is the discussion that goes unaddressed by the Medical Experts, but the Victims and Society deserve answers about the impact of these dangerous drugs.
It’s a messed up world and there’s nothing new under the Sun. Check out Peter O’Toole’s movie from the ‘60s called “The Ruling Class.” Amazing it ever got released for We Peasants to view.


17 posted on 09/10/2025 11:47:40 AM PDT by Jarvis Law 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Add New York State to that list. Mario Cuomo closed many of the psych centers in the State, claiming the residents could get better treatment in the community. Well, we know that was a lie. The only reason it was done, was because NY State was strapped for cash as a Blue-run State always is. Then in the early 80's, crime in the State rose to the point that Cuomo ended up turning those closed psych centers into prisons around the State, and a lot of the nutcases he cut loose, ended up in the prison system. I know, because I worked in uniform for NY State Corrections for 25 years. I was retired before Andrew Cuomo became Governor. He closed even more psych centers, and then started closing multiple prisons around the State, throwing inmates who hadn't yet completed their court-ordered sentences onto the street. He dumped a lot out during Covid too. The claim this time was that crime was down, which of course we know is a bald-faced lie. Hochul has overseen the closure of even more prisons, and has plans to close more as soon as possible.

So they let nutcases out onto the street, then those same nutcases ended up in the prison system. And the closures of prisons only puts even more nutcases and repeat offenders back out on the street. Add no-bail release, and you have a fire storm.

18 posted on 09/10/2025 11:48:55 AM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jarvis Law 2.0

The Ruling Class

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ruling_Class_(film)


19 posted on 09/10/2025 12:00:19 PM PDT by Jarvis Law 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

You’re right, Berkeley would have been more appropriate.


20 posted on 09/10/2025 12:05:07 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson