Posted on 09/04/2025 12:25:37 PM PDT by Morgana
UTICA, N.Y. -- A "rarely used charge" has been deemed appropriate for a Utica woman following her son's involvement in various felony and misdemeanor activities.
According to a release from the Utica Police Department, Nurto Mohamed, 36, was arrested for endangering the welfare of a child due to "failure to exercise due diligence in control of a child."
The charge follows her 11-year-old son's involvement in criminal acts since the start of this year.
According to officials, the child has been linked to at least four felony acts, including a robbery, and a recent burglary with a 12-year-old accomplice.
The burglary resulted in damage to several vehicles and the theft of two cars, which were driven around the City, causing further damage.
The District Attorney's Office determined that this rarely used charge was appropriate due to the public nuisance caused.
"Each and every time, Mohamed has been made aware of the behavior and was offered services for assistance," according to UPD.
Due to the child's age, he cannot be charged with crimes, but authorities decided action was necessary.
"Going forward we will explore this charge for similar incidents and patterns, but we are hopeful that this is a last resort option as parents are willing to partner with us and community providers to ensure safe and appropriate behaviors for their children," according to the UPD report.
(Excerpt) Read more at wktv.com ...
And they’ll go out and do the same things over; so will the care center place be held responsible?
While the driver is being charged with negligence no one is going after the CPS who hired that company.
And they’ll go out and do the same things over; so will the care center place be held responsible?
No.
I clicked on the link and there’s a mugshot of the mom.
She really has a IDGAF look on her face.
It’s liberal mania all over.
At best when they screw up massively ten years down the road someone might get some money. But no one will be fired, no one will go to jail, no policies will actually be changed.
In Arizona there was another case of a dad who lost custody of his kid because of reasons totally unrelated to his care of the child. The child was diabetic and, a few weeks after he was in government custody, he died. Was the dad father of the year? No, but kid in custody of his father, alive. In government custody, dead.
No one was punished for that one either.
Do I think CPS is totally useless? Not... totally. Just 98%.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.