To: E. Pluribus Unum
2 posted on
09/01/2025 2:17:20 PM PDT by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍! Winning currently!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Consider the fact that, if Kennedy’s vaccine skepticism gains traction, then the whole pandemic narrative —mandates, lockdowns, “trust the science”— starts unraveling. So, defending the CDC and attacking Kennedy is a way to defend the mRNA vaccines without being too obvious about it.
It is an existential threat. As we’ve discussed before, if the covid ‘vaccines’ are ever revealed to be more risky than helpful, the Democrat party will cease to exist as a meaningful political force.
Jeff Childers - https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/pharmapocalypse-monday-september
3 posted on
09/01/2025 2:18:08 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Democrats have staked their entire identity on the covid vaccines. Not just recommending them, but mandating them, moralizing them, punishing dissent, and branding themselves “the party of science.” If mRNA is ultimately revealed to be more harmful than helpful, the Democrats risk becoming the modern Whigs— leaders of yesterday’s failed orthodoxy, discredited by tomorrow’s unavoidable truth.
A party can survive bad policy. What it cannot survive is being on the wrong side of a civilizational dividing line. Like cornered animals, the Democrats may be sensing a similar kind of Reckoning is coming for them.
Jeff Childers - https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/pharmapocalypse-monday-september
4 posted on
09/01/2025 2:20:14 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The lack of leadership on the plandemic from the man who was hoodwinked into calling the jabs ‘a Christmas miracle’ etc. is disturbing.
5 posted on
09/01/2025 2:24:21 PM PDT by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 "/!i!! &@$%&*(@ -')
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Jail the CEO and Board of Directors.
6 posted on
09/01/2025 2:26:47 PM PDT by
nonliberal
(Russia is not my enemy.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
we have the numbers, Mr. President. they aren’t what you think.
7 posted on
09/01/2025 2:39:10 PM PDT by
dadfly
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I notice that Trump’s statement merely criticizes Pfizer for not publicizing what they have told him privately about their vaccine’s success.
He doesn’t criticize Pfizer at all for creating their mRNA vaccine. He still has never once endorsed the jab paranoia so popular here at FR.
This is not fair. What do conspiracy addicts have to do in order to get Trump to don a tinfoil hat and start talking up “turbo cancer”?
They have come so far by getting RFKjr to resurrect the Jenny McCarthy/ Andy Wakefield Autism theory. Victory is almost in their grasp. Stay strong!
9 posted on
09/01/2025 3:20:30 PM PDT by
Pelham
(President Eisenhower. Operation Wetback 1953-54)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Both my wife and I have mild Covid. We were both offered Paxlovid but declined.
10 posted on
09/01/2025 4:37:28 PM PDT by
UB355
(slow traffic stay right)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson