1 posted on
08/30/2025 11:17:27 AM PDT by
Jacquerie
To: Jacquerie
“crackdowns”?
Since when is jacking up taxes a “crackdown”?
2 posted on
08/30/2025 11:19:50 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Jacquerie
The dynamics in play already…are why Socialism is gaining steam. If Zohran Mamdani wins the NYC mayoral elections, the seismic implications will overshadow even Taylor Swift.
To: Jacquerie

Looks like there might be a little problem with her beach facing slope.
5 posted on
08/30/2025 11:23:29 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Jacquerie
Won’t it be the Taylor Kelce Tax?
6 posted on
08/30/2025 11:25:57 AM PDT by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: Jacquerie
IOW, don’t be successful because the left wants to tax you more because of your success since they’re all jealous and all.
8 posted on
08/30/2025 11:37:18 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
To: Jacquerie
Conservatives focus on the absurd power and spending of the Federal Government, which is correct
But the real tax burden, social engineering, and ground troops of the Left are in massive local taxes to support bloated local government
I’ve lived in both NY and CA, so have seen it up close.
9 posted on
08/30/2025 11:41:53 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: Jacquerie
As of April 2025, the $1 million-plus category has been the fastest-growing real estate sales segment for 21 months straight, according to data from the National Association of Realtors®. This is simply evidence of inflation, the debasement of the currency. A million dollars won't buy what it used to, even five years ago.
10 posted on
08/30/2025 11:50:37 AM PDT by
T Ruth
(Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
To: Jacquerie
As an added injustice, the owners don’t get to vote in the jurisdiction, even though they have to pay taxes there.
11 posted on
08/30/2025 11:52:40 AM PDT by
T Ruth
(Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
To: Jacquerie
Many folks in RI have homes that they bought for $200k years ago that are worth well above $1 million now. They are hardly “ultra wealthy.”
Jealousy and Envy are horrible afflictions.
To: Jacquerie
Everyone who is not poor needs to be punished.
15 posted on
08/30/2025 12:21:08 PM PDT by
fruser1
To: Jacquerie
Ridiculous!
American communists leave no stone unturned when it comes to stealing from taxpayers’ wallets...
16 posted on
08/30/2025 12:30:00 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
To: Jacquerie
Why is “looking for new revenue streams” never “scouring the books for cost saving opportunities”?
To: Jacquerie
No kids and private security,so she has minimal effect on the local budget. If anything, she should get a discount.
Now back to my usual posts of Swift delenda est.
22 posted on
08/30/2025 1:17:17 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(I refuse to call the left "progressive" because I do not see slavery to the government as progress.)
To: Jacquerie
Meet your pimp called government. You better pay the man.
To: Jacquerie
...that’s an extra $136,000 a year in property taxes...Does Taylor come with it?
26 posted on
08/30/2025 2:35:01 PM PDT by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: Jacquerie
The state’s pitch is blunt: Wealthy absentee owners should contribute more to local revenue, especially in luxury markets that have exploded in value.
Wealthy absentee owners don't drive on the roads much, don't use utilities much, don't send kids to school there, can't vote in local elections usually, etc., etc. If anything, wealthy absentee owners should have a reduced tax rate, not a punitive one!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson