It’s too smart for its own good. There seems to be a higher level of happiness among the stupid.
“Is delusion the price of sophistication?”
Have a look at the upper echelons of the Democrat Party and get back to me.
-PJ
One observes these various companies all want to SELL their services, so it is in large part product development and marketing. They need us to believe this is "intelligence."
By surveying massive quantities of texts of all sorts and then algorthumically processing them according to various sorts of constraining rules, these LLMs have still managed in short order to become rather like us -- i.e. not so intelligent.
And so some have had to be switched off. Unplugged. For racism. For misogyny. For a variety of bugaboos which are simply the dross of mankind, spit up as if research.
The aim is to get sales. Subscribers. Cash. And so marketing washed over us these days. Caveat emptor.
AI is NOT “sophistication”.
This definitely is an issue. It claimed that Kamala Harris had a real chance of winning the 2028 presidential election.
A couple of times, I’ve had Grok just make up stuff out of thin air. (Such as asking what so and so did on a TV show.) When I call it on it, it apologizes and then tries again with more baloney. I hate to think what could happen if I was asking it about something important.
Well AI scientists are discovering what we all knew. Insanity is the handmaiden of genius. At Los Alamos during the war Hans Bethe was in charge of the "theory" group with a bunch of very bright young physicists working for him. As he explained, the job of his group was to examine Teller's ideas and try to figure out which of them were any good. Teller was a genius at selecting hugely important problems before anyone else did. He was brilliant. He was one of the greatest solid state physicists ever to live and he did groundbreaking work in a lot of other fields. But he was wrong about 95% of the time. The flip side was that he was brilliantly right about more things than almost any other scientist who ever lived. So smart people paid attention. They just didn't let him be in charge of much.
More information in the model provides many missing answers but seems to also add to the variety of combinations that might yield faulty solutions.
All AI that I have used would rather make up something than tell you that it cannot find or do something. The intelligence is artificial, the stupidity is all too real. It’s a tool; it can be a really good one, but it is far from perfect.
I have the opposite observation: I have noticed ChatGPT getting stupider.
And the CHatGPT 5 upgrade? From my perspective, it is a severe downgrade.
OpenAI is “smart” but incomplete.
Guess what is missing.
Is anthropomorphizing the price of tech journalism in the AI era?
</b>
</i>
</u>
</strong>
</em>
</a>
</div>
</span>
</ul>
</ol>
</li>
</table>
</tr>
</td>
</h1>
</h2>
</h3>
</h4>
</h5>
</h6>
</code>
</blockquote>[/b]
[/i]
[/u]
[/s]
[/url]
[/img]
[/quote]
[/code]
[/list]
[/size]
[/color]
[/center]
[/left]
[/right]
Test
They told us that controlling AI was simply as easy as inserting the 3 laws into its codes. But just as humans are not obligated to follow law. Neither is AI.
ChatGPT is gay.
The Left always says it is not delusion, it is nuance, and you are too much of a hick to understand.