Posted on 08/11/2025 10:01:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
I think of AI as Wikipedia on steroids. The left has all the more reason to put out lies so that when AI sweeps up all the information on a topic from the Internet, those lies are part of it. Just like Wikipedia, AI will be very useful for statistics like who won the Masters in 1962 but not for anything remotely political.
Exactly! 👍
I have the opposite observation: I have noticed ChatGPT getting stupider.
And the CHatGPT 5 upgrade? From my perspective, it is a severe downgrade.
OpenAI is “smart” but incomplete.
Guess what is missing.
Is anthropomorphizing the price of tech journalism in the AI era?
</b>
</i>
</u>
</strong>
</em>
</a>
</div>
</span>
</ul>
</ol>
</li>
</table>
</tr>
</td>
</h1>
</h2>
</h3>
</h4>
</h5>
</h6>
</code>
</blockquote>[/b]
[/i]
[/u]
[/s]
[/url]
[/img]
[/quote]
[/code]
[/list]
[/size]
[/color]
[/center]
[/left]
[/right]
Test
They told us that controlling AI was simply as easy as inserting the 3 laws into its codes. But just as humans are not obligated to follow law. Neither is AI.
Grok is nuts, and has no logic and just backs down and makes excuses when confronted with its lies.
I wouldn’t trust a decision about how to have my breakfast eggs to AI. Because it AI isn’t.
ChatGPT is gay.
The Left always says it is not delusion, it is nuance, and you are too much of a hick to understand.
BTTT
A former coworker friend of mine in Florida sent me the text from his computer that he copied after letting it run overnight. It was just on and running overnight, and sporadically through the night it just started printing random strange ramblings.
Don’t you know genius borders on insanity?-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.