They repossessed her car, she took their name: Ohio woman’s legal revenge stuns dealership

Notebook Check ^ | 31 July 2025 | David Odejide

[Bigg Red]

Why is it good for her? Sounds like her car was repossessed because she did not keep up her payments.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

She never got a chance to make the payments. They took the car back inside of a month and that would have been before the first payment was due.

[Bigg Red]

k, thanks

[oldtech]

I think if I were the judge on a case like this, I would threaten both parties with a beating if they ever showed up in my court again.

[Bigg Red]

😄

[Chickensoup]

She’s a lawyer or a scammer.

Not a good look.

[Chickensoup]

She’s got to be a lawyer or paralegal

[GranTorino]

Probably falsified a pay stub..
Lying on the credit application=repo.

[BDParrish]

Freegards Nick!
I appreciate your contribution here often. You’re a help!
The judge separated the two questions.
The fine print will give the car back to the dealership depending, as I have not read it.
The other question ought to go her way on the technicalities. It should be heard at a different time with different judge right?
The solution is to compromise.
Wonder how she will negotiate that.
BrianD