Ping!....................
Poppycock!
Are these the “scientists” who believe that their are more than two genders?
As we know scientists can make their results come out the way they want them to.
Strange Theory...
.
But
.
I Know “He Is Risen”.
After hearing “follow the science” by the lunatic communist left until I was sick of hearing it, I don’t believe a single solitary thing they say, do, write, study, propose, etc anymore...well, except maybe “The Bell Curve”. IF they wanna “follow the sceince”, let em follow that...spit.
If this guy is competent and credible, the next step should be some serious discussions with the other elite researchers on the shroud for critical cross examination. That could be interesting. I’d read the book and/or watch the podcasts.
If it all stays within the court of social media and hack journalism, it will be eady to dismiss.
The evidence that changed the world is the eye witnesses and their subsequent actions and testimony, not this shroud.
Researcher A: The Shroud is genuine.
Researcher B: The Shroud is not genuine.
Researcher C: The Shroud could be genuine.
On and on it goes.
Anyway, I’m looking forward to a Daily Mail article claiming that Mohammed never existed. I suppose I’m in for a long wait.
🤔
Thanks for showing this! People are going to be people, and they are going to believe what they believe. I spent a great deal of time in Israel and Europe and saw many relics that were revered by the Church. I have to say that the Catholic Churches that are hundreds of years old across Europe and the Middle East are Magnificent and the most beautifully adorned buildings on earth. But they are buildings designed to make people feel holy by their rituals. Sometimes it works. Sometimes not.
Interesting that the Shroud can’t be reproduced with modern technology but people living fifteen hundred years ago can produce this Shroud. In the negative. Why?
Here’s a theory:
The image on the Shroud may not have formed from physical contact, but from Christ’s glorified body passing upward through the cloth in a moment of dematerialization—just as He later passed through walls. This could have left a precise, undistorted image—like a spiritual “photographic” imprint—consistent with resurrection, not decay.
It explains why the image isn’t distorted like it would be if the cloth were wrapped around a 3D body.
If this was so obvious, why didn’t someone come up with about 1,000 years ago?
And anyway, who cares what this guy thinks? Either you believe in Jesus Crist or you don’t.
Personally I believe and will continue to do so regardless of what some unbeliever may say.
This has previously been debunked. Years ago it was determined that the image could only have been made if the cloth were on a 3D model. This was to show it couldn’t have been just a painting. This is almost as bad as the “scientific consensus” regarding eggs and cholesterol.
LOL! As soon as you hit the word “scientists”, you automatically know to be highly skeptical of anything said!
It amazes me how intense people can get over this issue.
The apostle Paul said that is was a shame for men to have long hair. The Old Testament forbid priests to have hair that dangled. The Shroud has Jesus with long hair, but there had to be someone (the treacherous Judas) identify him to the Roman soldiers when they came to arrest him. Men did not wear long hair at that time in Rome. He would have stood out in a large crowd.
During his burial preparation he had about a hundred pounds of material wrapped around him that hardened into a protective cacoon. The only cloth mentioned was one that was placed over his face.
Not going to read the article.
But I have to wonder how the 3D guy explains the several pints of human blood from a tortured man came to be on the Shroud.
The blood from the wound in side was shown to be post-mortem.
The artist of the shroud must have been a ghoul dedicated to his art.
First he creates a truly life like sculpture (maybe dead like is more appropriate).
Then he tortures a man and collects his blood for his art.
Then he lets the man die and then he know just when to collect the blood from his victim so that plasma and red blood cells have separated but rigor mortise has not yet set in.
Then he quickly paints the Shroud with this blood in just the right places to mimick the Christ suffering on the cross.
A true master piece indeed for an artist of the pre-Renaissance period.
Sorry, Brazilian 3D designer and researcher Cicero Moraes, is a talented prevaricator.
I am sure that he will soon be shown the error of his ways by real scientist.
Researchers have used forensic geometric modeling and image processing to reverse map a 3D human body from shroud data so not sure what this guy is talking about
The Good News is fake news!!!
Scientist reveal! That’s all I need for validating this article.