Posted on 08/01/2025 6:02:53 AM PDT by Red Badger
LOL. What a LIE.
He’s using computer and interpolative tools but hasn’t shown a true working example...the real proof would come if they tested the computers results against the actual doing. Take a shroud and drape it over a very detailed sculpture super heated in such away to produce the same image as what is found on the shrowd. Paint won’t do it...it would smudge. The Shrowd image was not paint but a thin charring as though it were a flash image produced from an intense light source.
Otherwise this article is bunk full of digital flatulent vaporware speculation. He was making a speculation based on results colored by parameters he personaly programmed into software. Now he needs to find a way to reproduce in real life what the software is suggesting. I suspect he can’t do it.
My family and I attended a three day seminar on the Shroud and there is no way I would or could say it's a fraud.
Many objects were kept in secret to protect them. They were often moved around in secret. Sometimes objects got into the wrong hands, but something prevailed upon them to pass the objects to the right hands. Finally, things ended up in churches, though they often got stolen or destroyed too. Look up crown jewels of different royal families. Same stories.
Indeed. And I think the subtle word choice was intentional “Reveals” vs. “claims to prove.” They can get back to me once they’ve generated a real, not a virtual sculpture, and actually replicated the shroud-like image onto it
A whole lot of highly qualified experts have said otherwise, but I guess if a 3D designer from Brazil says it’s not, all those smart guys are wrong.
Christianity is not about relics, anyway.
Say, does anybody know what a 3D designer is?
At the Daily Mail, perhaps. But an interesting lecture with link to a PowerPoint presentation is suggested. ( Circa 2 hours in length, but most detailed )
Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn't Exist | Dr. Jay Smith 9 July 2025
Passing through the cloth at the moment of transition would be equivalent of draping the body lying stationary.
But, you notice in the left image the figure’s hips are extremely wide, as if the image maker were incompetent at drawing the human figure or trying to show something to make his point.
This leaves too much unanswered.
Science is science ONLY when it’s Politically Correct.
I fear I wasn’t clear enough in my post #11. Whether or not Mohammed existed - that was not my point. My point was that the Daily Mail would be too afraid to bring the topic up for discussion.
Mainstream media rules:
Bashing Christian beliefs: That’s okay.
Bashing Jewish beliefs: That’s okay.
Bashing Muslim beliefs: Forbidden!
Anyway, thanks for the replies.
Right On!
If the shroud is ‘real’, I’ve thought it must be due to something like your theory.
I saw a nail from the cross of Jesus in a museum in Vienna.
St. Peter’s Cathedral in Trier, Germany, which I visited years ago, holds the robe that Jesus wore at the time of his crucifixion although it wasn’t on display at the time of my visit. It was woven by his mother Mary and won by a Roman soldier who successfully gambled for it.
Just the latest attempt to debunk it. I remember when it was reported that it was fake because there was an imprint of a coin, and the text on the coin was backwards.
I don’t see how you jump to ‘worship of graven images’.
It’s like people saying that Catholics ‘worship’ the Virgin Mary,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.