Posted on 07/15/2025 6:59:49 AM PDT by cuz1961
Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn't Exist
Islamofacist kryptonit
aka
Dismantling Islam
RT 1 hr 56 m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy_iD6Lf6MY&pp=ygUqVHdvIG5ldyBmaW5kaW5ncyB0aGF0IG1vaGFtbWVkIGRpZG50IGV4aXN0
.
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Mad Mo was anything but peaceful and kind. He was one of the most evil people ever to walk the face of the earth.
Yes, the delusional, lying, murderous, child molester did exist, unfortunately.
Archaeological, historical ? Anything other than Islamic folklore ?
How do you know it wasn't a bunch of pedophiles that came up with the whole 9 year old bride Fatima story or the acceptance of pedophilia ?
Also, you haven't viewed the facts in this video before your post have you ?
If you hate Islam as much as you seem to, as I do, you would welcome facts to defeat Islam ,
and to throw into the arrogant Palestinian hugging lefties faces !
and to throw into the arrogant Palestinian hugging lefties faces .
Not to mention the reprobate Muslim huggers in academia that guard Islam . Please reconsider watching the vid. .
I’d like to see a cage match between Mohammed and Jesus. I think that MTV might have done that on their claymation show “Celebrity Boxing.” Who’s your money on?
There is no contemporaneous evidence that Mohammed ever existed. Plenty of records on the Arab conquests of the 7th century. But nothing about Mo himself until 60-80 years after he supposedly transitioned to Muslim paradise.
Homer didn’t write the Odyssey, but somebody else named Homer did. Same thing here. Muhammed didn’t write the Koran, but somebody else, possibly also named Muhammed, did. Somebody wrote it, and I don’t think it was Allah.
Muhammed didn’t write the Koran, but somebody else, possibly
/
The answer to that question of where the koran came from are covered in depth in the video.
VERY interesting info he presents .
Jesus would turn the other cheek, Mohammed would slaughter him.
Who’s your money on?
/
Mo, if he exist(ed) which I now totally don’t believe did,
..if he did then I’d say he’s a bit busy at a BBQ, his own.
Jesus would turn the other cheek, Mohammed would slaughter him.
/
sounds like what a Muslim or atheist would say.
/-(
I haven’t looked into this much lately but isn’t a lot of the Koran taken from Jewish and Christian non-canonical books?
Thanks for posting. I remember when Newsweek, or some such, asked if Jesus Christ actually lived. The historicity of Jesus was probably not a pleasant topic when first introduced. Now however, the fact of his life is established as history. The same cannot be said of Muhammad.
A lot of this detailed analysis goes over my head, but I think I have the general picture. What you would like to have:
A) Eyewitness testimony. I believe the gospels of Mathew and John apply. If not that, at least something close. For example, I think Mark wrote down what the eye-witness Peter heard and saw.
B) A written record from the time, or at least from a nearby time. I think the four gospels, Acts, and the writings of Paul are examples. Also, the writings of Roman and Jewish historians.
A record written at a much later date and place attributed back is suspect. While Thomas existed, there is no good argument that he authored the so-called gospel of Thomas.
The historicity of Muhammad comes up very short. The same for the understanding of Mecca. It seems that all the written texts were created and systematized many centuries after the fact and from hundreds of miles away. There are no eyewitness accounts and no contemporary writing. It’s kind of like picking up some gay bible written in 1980 that reports that Jesus was gay. In either case, we are talking about a fabrication.
Read this book Christoph Luxenberg
The author a semitic language scholar and historian of Islam writes under a pseudonym to avoid being murdered by its adherents.
“But nothing about Mo himself until 60-80 years after he supposedly transitioned to Muslim paradise.”
As I understood the video, it’s much worse than that. Something like 400 to 800 years after he died.
I have read many Hadiths
—
You do realize that the Hadiths and Sunnahs were written and compiled from the translation of Old Syriac on old carpets and tattered wall-hangings 200 years after the supposed death of Mohammad?
You need to read the Hadiths and Sunnahs which chronicle the life and sayings of Muhammad, these are Talibari, Muslim, Isaq and Bukhari; Hadiths are Mohammed’s word to his followers, the Sunnahs are the history of Muhammad and his motto (sic) was “Kill. Kill. Kill”...
We do not destroy archeological evidence as we have a sense that everything that is true testifies to God
—
Early Christians destroyed plenty of archeological evidence they considered pagan. Statues with noses knocked off was done by early Christians in Egypt and later copied by musselmen. There are hosts of Greek temples and statues destroyed by Christians as late as the 18th century.
Good point. Without getting into Muhammad being illiterate (if he existed) and having to tell someone else what to write in the Koran. The fact of the matter is, whether or not he existed we're arguing with someone's ideas. And those ideas are provably false. The teachings in Islam don't stand up to the Apostle Paul's teaching on what to do when someone claims to be a prophet (see tagline). After Sep 11 I read the Koran and some of the hadiths. It's complete bull crap, written like you'd expect someone to write a new religion if all he wanted to do was convince the dumb, violent men around him to steal and kill and bring sex slaves to him so they can get to Diddy-level sex orgy heaven.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.