Posted on 07/10/2025 10:27:52 AM PDT by Signalman
Just release the democrat names:)
Is there an opportunity to oust John Roberts with this information? It would be great to replace him and there are rumors.
Move on....Epstein is dead...
The admin has already said there are no names, so he cannot legally be held responsible for releasing what he knows.
So, why say anything. Pointless attention seeking ambulance chaser.
“Pam Bondi’s exact statement that Jeffrey Epstein’s client list was sitting on her desk for review,”
Outright lie or misrepresentation.
Her exact statement never said client list.
I imagine not everyone arrived on Epstein’s plane.
He was Epstein’s attorney...so Attorney Client privilege.
My thoughts on this are there are MANY big wigs in the ME that have been clients of Epstein, Trump is trying to broker peace in the ME and having this information out there now would definitely NOT HELP the situation!! In the ME these bastards marry children for goodness sakes so they see nothing wrong with molesting minors, HOWEVER you release the list it would have to be ALL or nothing SO our pedophiles take a walk also!!! I am going to wait and see if after a peace deal is brokered in the ME if the information comes out!!!
A list of names means exactly nothing. I fail to even see why it is an issue. Hell, I could make up a list of democrats we don’t like, and just call it good...
Bubba eventually gave up his law license. So the statement “I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky” as well as other events in that case did have some consequences. Posters are right that there should be flight logs of those who went to Epstein’s island for underage girls. For some reason Pam Bondi doesn’t even want to release a summary of those flight logs.
The people who have engaged in this aren’t all dead. Trafficking is not okay and to say you don’t care is fine if that is how you feel. Other people do take this seriously and are not okay with blackmail, trafficking, and heaven knows what else.
*************
The question asked by Fox reporter John Roberts to Pam Bondi back in February was "DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen?" In response, Bondi stated, "It's sitting right now on my desk to review". Note the reply is "It's" -- not they or those.
That sounds reasonable.
However, I would not be surprised to learn that the Biden FBI (and holdovers) have so corrupted the evidence as to make it faulty, misleading, and worse than useless.
Epstein’s estate, initially valued at $600 million, now sits at $145 million after a $111.6 million IRS refund.
The estate’s funds, now largely protected from major claims, may benefit Epstein’s executors and unnamed beneficiaries, frustrating victims.
Legal battles continue, with Epstein’s executors facing a class action lawsuit from victims not yet compensated by the estate.
https://gvwire.com/2025/01/15/jeffrey-epsteins-estate-got-a-112-million-tax-refund/
The problem is that he would have had to sign all kinds of non-disclosure statements with the us.cia in order to be allowed to represent Epstein. Breach is a felony - jail, fines, law license gone....
I woke up this morning with the realization that the only explanation for this is that Trump is on the list. Nothing else makes sense.
This is like Watergate. It will never go away, and it will lead to Trump’s resignation.
“I could care less....”
So you advocate turning your head to child rape by the wealthy and privileged class?
Trump likely has tried to make some deal here, but its about to blow up big time.
And then you would be sued into penury for slander because the list wouldn’t ever be available to use as proof you wweren’t slandering them.
so none of the clients are on the videos?
just the perv’s stash of kiddie porn?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.