|
Posted on 06/30/2025 9:00:02 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
The key in the case is the prosecutor. It is prosecutorial discretion what evidence is used and what witnesses are called to support the charges brought against the defendant. The cases were tailored to where the evidence pointed to Maxwell and Epstein being the perps and no one else. If Maxwell’s ‘black book’ was not submitted and used as evidence, then in the trial’s view it doesn’t exist and is still protected by privacy and defamation laws.
That is what Comey’s daughter did when she prosecuted Epstein. She tailored the evidence to where it all pointed to Epstein and no one else, no client related evidence was used or introduced. Comey’s ‘protected’ the clients of Epstein because she introduced evidence that pointed to Epstein and no one else. None of the evidence used to convict Epstein mentioned, suggested or pointed to clients or other perps being involved. I do find it interesting that Epstein’s defense team didn’t try to enter evidence of his clients being the perps as a defense.
Prosecutors abuse prosecutorial discretion all the time and
Comey’s daughter did it to the extreme.
********************************
As for what is going on now with Trump he could be baiting the swamp to make them demand the Epstein data, which the House is trying to do, so when the data is produced they have no one to blame but themselves. There are sealed indictments, which could include Epstein’s clients, waiting to be unsealed. The House ‘demanding’ the Epstein client list could be a trigger to unseal some of the indictments that could name Epstein clients.
Comey’s daughter looks like his clone with long hair. Certainly got beat with the ugly stick.
True and as I mentioned in another comment despite the time that has passed since Epstein was first convicted in 2008 Trump could have captured the credible evidence and it is now sitting with one of the many unsealed indictments waiting for a trigger to unseal it and arrest people.
s/b sealed indictments not unsealed
Comey’s daughter just got fired for her Epstein case tactics, i.e. filing to keep the evidence/files used in trial sealed after the case.
.
While I understand your point about prosecutorial tailored evidence that keeps me wondering what the heck got “tailored” out of the Maxwell trial. It always sounded like the prosecution was working just hard enough to get a two dollar conviction. And realizing now that it was Comey junior doing the work the question jumps out as to WHO she was leaving out. I always had the impression she was working just hard enough to keep Maxwell quiet for a decade or so because if she used evidence from more of the alleged kiddiemollests she could have put her away for life. But doing that might have made Maxwell mad enough to squeal way bigger. And you can’t keep killing all your defendents.
Now that it seems Comey Jr has been fired there might be some files we can get a look at?
Understanding the absence of an “Epstein List” requires examining how carefully tailored investigations can obstruct justice. Epstein’s associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, was convicted on trafficking charges, yet only four victims were highlighted—each directly linked to Epstein’s personal predations. Consequently, there was never an official compilation by investigators and prosecutors of the powerful men who abused the many other young girls trafficked by Epstein. The broader network, connecting hundreds more victims to influential predators, was deliberately omitted from public scrutiny. This prosecutorial myopia is reminiscent of historical efforts to safeguard the reputations of powerful elites, sacrificing comprehensive justice for political expediency.
Maurene Comey’s selection of a limited victim scope appears strategic. By focusing exclusively on Epstein’s personal transgressions, her team effectively shielded the identities of powerful men who benefited from Epstein’s depraved enterprise. Such calculated limitation raises the uncomfortable possibility of undue influence. The FBI, under James Comey’s tenure, has faced longstanding criticism for politicized investigatory choices; thus, skepticism toward Maurene Comey’s motives is well-founded.
Criticism toward Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, therefore, misses the mark. They cannot release what doesn’t exist; the so-called Epstein List was never compiled by investigators and prosecutors, deliberately obscured by prosecutorial design.
.....The Epstein List, as widely imagined, will never surface—not because its subjects are fictitious, but because careful prosecutorial engineering ensured their anonymity.
https://amuseonx.substack.com/p/fwiw-there-isnt-an-epstein-list?
gisd O
“Maurene Comey, daughter of James Comey, is fired from her job as a federal prosecutor”
Too little, too late.
She should have been fired day 1.
And realizing now that it was Comey junior doing the work the question jumps out as to WHO she was leaving out.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxx
WHO’s being left out??
Smells to me like it might be billy jeff & hildabeast?
If you want to dig down in the Corney family rabbit hole, don’t leave out brother peter the fixer for the CF
It’s a family affair
***********
Now it so happens that James Comey has a brother, Peter Comey, who had an executive position with the Washington law firm that did the audit of the Clinton foundation in 2015. Peter Comey was officially DLA Piper “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas,” in 2015 when the Clinton Foundation scandals first broke and Hillary was preparing her Presidential campaign. Not
I can’t say for certain who that corpse is, but I have a faint recollection that someone did an ear comparison, and Rodham’s ear from a random live photo was identical to the corpse’s ear. Ears are quite unique - God’s art I assume. I concede that photos posted online can be doctored. That’s my best recollection of the analysis of Epstein’s “corpse” in 2019 and 2020. I don’t want that JE scumbag to still be alive, but my best guess is that he is and trials are happening behind the scenes, possibly using EO 13818.
Do you think it’s possible that they’re trying to cement an eternal fluoride ban by LOSING the appeal, forever preventing a future D administration (in 50 years hopefully 😁) from ever re-introducing fluoride into substances for human consumption?
Haha! That’s one way to ruin a leftist event. I hope the agenda was heavily populated with DoD speakers and the event has now been rendered “impuissant”.
here’s the latest episodes of the X22 Report:
Ep 3687a - Gold Is Signaling The Collapse Of The Fiat System, Constitution Reset Is Coming
Ep 3687b - [DS] Is Trapped In Their Trap, All Three Movies Playing At Same Time, Stage Set
.
ransomnote: I thought the following excerpt from the New York Times was a bit curious. I haven't seen Haberman's name for awhile.
Manhattan Prosecutor Who Handled Epstein Cases Is Fired
Jonah E. Bromwich William K. Rashbaum Michael S. Schmidt Santul Nerkar and Maggie Haberman
July 16, 2025
"In 2017, the gossip site Radar Online sued the F.B.I. in the Southern District under the Freedom of Information Act, seeking the release of certain documents related to the investigation and prosecution of Mr. Epstein.In a declaration submitted in that case in January 2024, Ms. Comey wrote that releasing the documents could damage the government’s case in a potential retrial of Ms. Maxwell, including by subjecting witnesses “to possible embarrassment and harassment” that could make them less likely to testify.
Later that year, the judge overseeing that case sided with the F.B.I."
It seems as though the states might have the best chance of keeping fluoride out of the water by filing suit against the EPA claiming adding or not adding fluoride to water is a Tenth Amendment issue.
And then the possibility that the records have been scrubbed/added to or otherwise changed. Who knows.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
