That the provision was only slipped into the bill after midnight on the day the House had to vote for it suggests that it might be primed for insider dealings.
Done right, selected land sales make a lot of sense.
Why would anyone oppose shrinking the Fedgub’s bloated land portfolio?
The Fed has no right to the land in the West and these Reps are wrong.
They really should be asking why the !$**% does the “government” “own” this much land???
No “affordable” housing. Like section 8. No cheap condos. Single family homes only. Besides, prices will go down when we deport in the numbers like they (broken) promised.
Federal land sales needs to be left just like it is right now. NO.
I can see all the prime spots being sold off with insider deals.
Unbelievable that still today ANYONE defends letting the feds keep more land. US gubment owns 1/3 of US land already.
Jefferson and Lincoln would both be sick to their stomachs.
Utah has an obscene amount of its territory unconstitutionally held by the Federal government. Obama confiscated millions of acres. Its ridiculous. The constitution strictly limits the amount of land to be held by the government to forts and monuments.
Lands sales to U.S. citizens and companies. No shell companies or foreigners, especially China.
Newhouse and Valadao are the only 2 surviving members of the 10. They need to be primaried and removed. Keep primarying them every time until they are out and if they win the primary, then deny them so much as a plug nickel in funding. Get that backstabbing RINO scum OUT!
It deals with BLM lands adjacent to urban areas.