Lets put as succinctly as we can in a language that any really really dumb journalist out there working for the cause of the left can understand... IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM IS OVER... And they aren’t going to start up another one because they know what will happen if they do.
Doh!
It’s childish the way the media thinks it can somehow damage Trump my saying the bombing might not have destroyed this or that.
How would that reflect badly on the president?
They just hate that he’s succeeding.
Why would Iran make such an admission? I don’t think it’s a simple statement.
It could really mean, OK, I give up, I’ll be good. And in the meantime they are secretly rebuilding so when Trump leaves office they can nuke the hell out of everyone.
Baqaei
the khameini would like to see you in his bunker
He better check with his ayatollah.............
He doesn’t hate The Great Satan as much as DNCNN and NYT does.
What’s good for America is bad for the Democrats and what’s good for Democrats is bad for America. That old adage was true in the past, currently in the present, and will be true in the future. The American media has been almost gleeful in falsely reporting that the attacks on Iranian nuclear sites were less than successful. Their hatred for the bad “Orange Man” is so deep they would wish for the failure of the American military as long as it makes Trump look bad.
> Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmail Baqaei has confessed that Iran’s nuclear facilities have, in fact, been badly damaged… <
That’s a smart thing to say, regardless of the actual truth.
Saying, “The damage is minimal, we’ll be back in business soon.” … that would be inviting follow-up strikes.
And if follow-up strikes continue anyway, Iran can now claim it’s an overkill.
LOL, his boss Khamenei just said they were “untouched”!
Gee, whether to trust the leftist media or a mouthpiece for the islamists in Iran. Now that is truly a dilemma.
Reminds me of the time when Bush the later was President, and a devastating hurricane had just hit New Orleans. As Bush was flying down the MSM had two negative stories ready to roll.
1. If Bush landed they were going to say that Bush was interfering with on-the-ground work just for a photo op.
2. If Bush did not land, they were going to say Bush didn’t care enough to bother himself.
When the press has zero integrity, and the viewers are lo info slugs, words are simply words that are used to cause preferred reactions. That is now our reality.
While I remain convinced that the B-2 strikes inflicted significant damage, Iran’s sudden and uncharacteristic admission is deeply unsettling. This kind of transparency is entirely out of step with Tehran’s usual playbook of denial, deflection, and propaganda. In fact, the statement feels more like a calculated move than a moment of candor—and that, frankly, is cause for concern.
I don’t trust Iran’s information machinery for a second. So the question is: are they executing a strategic deception? Could this be a ruse—portraying their nuclear infrastructure as crippled in hopes the international spotlight will shift away, buying them time to recover in the shadows?
Ironically, I would have found it far more reassuring had they declared, “Our nuclear program is untouched.” That kind of bravado, typical of their usual narrative, would have been a far stronger indicator that the strikes actually hit their mark.
Maybe someone (Trump) could sue the MSM for false statements….. 🤔🤔🤔
Who to believe. MSM? or, Iran? Tough choice.
So, the victory parade has been cancelled?