Posted on 06/16/2025 6:56:30 AM PDT by Red Badger
Forgive me commenting before full read. It seems to me that most people who follow a truly healthful diet will see some weight loss. Especially if other lifestyle changes are adopted as well.
Even though the experts keeping moving the goalposts for when a person is considered obese there is no doubt that being severely obese is associated with major health problems. Your weight is not the only measure of health, however it can be the canary in the coalmine. Attention should be paid not only to weight gain but sudden weight loss.
If someone is obese they should not give up on a healthier diet just because they don’t lose weight. Adopting eating habits that are unhealthy just because it leads to weight loss is a bad idea.
The article never really describes what the headline implies.
But, if you can’t outrun a sloth, I’d say your health outlook is not good.
Whatever works for you. I am doing some basic calorie and portion counting. Learning that half a bag of chips is not a “serving” is eye opening for some people.
After a while, you change habits and your body reacts.
I was in a store trying on a new shirt a few weeks ago and the woman helping me actually said I looked tall and slim. I stopped what I was going and I guess my jaw dropped a little. I had never heard that comment…
I am down 90 pounds from my all time high.
I guess there is nothing like a former fat guy for preaching about the ills of weight gain! Ha Ha.
I don’t eat added sugar but did lose 15+ lbs recently in a few weeks just cutting back on shelled walnuts. Even not being overweight and on a fasting diet that was hard. It also didn’t make me any healthier or change any lipid markers. The Mediterranean Diet that this Harvard study used to measure long term calorie reduction has huge health benefits, no doubt but it is not a weight loss diet per se. E
If all depends on what they are looking at to determine if they are “healthier” or not.
If they look at certain levels of minerals or vitamins in the blood, sure. You can get hezlthier by eating better and getting those levels up without losing weight.
If they are looking at your bones and joints carrying extra weight, and stuff like muscle mass retention, O2 saturation and lung capacity, nope.
I agree. I only eat in a 2-3 hour window every morning but do try to walk before eating and in the gym as soon after as possible. :)
This is true. It’s not true that everyone with a weight problem is just eating too much; there are hormonal and metabolic disorders that make it much harder for some people to lose weight, and those need to be addressed.
Hospital food is the worst.
Bottom line is older people just don’t need that much food, it’s better to give your digestive system a break, so that the body can focus on cleaning up other things.
It is not weight alone which determines whether you are in good shape or not. For instance, at 195 lbs. I weight exactly what I did thirty-five years ago. The difference is that then I was all muscle and 12% body fat. The last time I was tested, I was now double that.
It was pretty normal when I was a Candy Striper in 1957-1961. Government always go overboard. Maybe RFK Jr. should look into this, too.
For some reason when I was in the hospital after finding out I was diabetic my blood sugar stayed above 200 most of the time. I wonder if the hospital diet had anything to do with it?, mmm.
The dietician was more considered with fats then with carbs. I was a bit gobsmacked when I was told it was o.k. to have pancakes and potatoes at breakfast because they would simply reduce my carb intake at lunch. I knew then that I’d better not rely on the hospital dietician for advice on getting my blood sugar under control.
Burning fat and gaining muscle mass will increase your weight.
Yes you do!
Great news for Lizzo.
You also don't want to interrupt the vagal nerve messages to and from your digestive organs.
I hope you aren’t stuck in it right now. LOL.
My former GP MD Dr had the amount of One Gram sugar packets taped up in her exam rooms for a can of Coca Cola and a small bottle of Orange juice.
The amount of sugar in both was similar.
The Coke was still more, but not by a lot.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.