Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One says there are no tapes. The other says there are tapes. Who is lying?
X ^ | 6/6/25 | Texas Patriot

Posted on 06/07/2025 9:46:21 AM PDT by hardspunned

Bondi vs Patel

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bondibashing; bondiwhiners; bondiwhining; bonginobashing; bonginowhining; doj; epsteinobsession; epsteinwasmossad; epsteinwhining; fbi; growup; israelownsus; jeffreyepstein; joerogan; kashbash; kashpatel; mossad; pambondi; patelbashing; patelwhiners; patelwhining; puutdownyourpearls; youare; zog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: happyathome

Do you honestly believe that the FBI, CIA, NSA have ANYTHING laying around that would disrupt THEIR control of government REALLY??? There is NOTHING that will EVER be brought to light EVER!! The DEEP STATE will always be in control Trump or no Trump they will NEVER find evidence of how they have been controlling the elites BANK ON IT!!!!


21 posted on 06/07/2025 10:53:13 AM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: happyathome

“The worst possibility here is that the Trump admin just took over the material to blackmail people themselves.”

Not plausible. If they had them, Congress would actually be cutting spending and defunding the left-wing NGO state instead of resisting this administration’s efforts to get spending and grift under control.


22 posted on 06/07/2025 11:10:19 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All

There are tapes but they were switched out or erased a long time ago...like CIA would let them sit in a box and be exposed some day...


23 posted on 06/07/2025 12:10:14 PM PDT by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat
The DEEP STATE will always be in control..

No, they won't. They might think they will be, but they won't. I'm sure people thought the Roman Empire was forever, or that the USSR would still be around.

24 posted on 06/07/2025 12:16:46 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

The only thing for certain is Bubba Clinton was the most frequent flyer. No tapes necessary to establish who the horndog is at the top of the list


25 posted on 06/07/2025 12:17:35 PM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup
No, they won't. They might think they will be, but they won't. I'm sure people thought the Roman Empire was forever, or that the USSR would still be around.

The Statsi had a file on everybody in East Germany in 1989.

26 posted on 06/07/2025 12:19:32 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned
Nothing new at all.

Thousands of standard porn videos.

Apparently, some number of Epstein videos with under age women.

There is no Epstein List.

There is no Epstein murderer.

Almost all of the tapes are just commercial porn.

More than 40 women have successfully sued Epstein for under age sex and/or sued Ghislaine Maxwell for trafficking young women to Epstein.

Only one woman has sued anyone besides Epstein.

One woman claimed she had under age sex, one time, with Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz. Dershowitz counter sued for defamation, and the woman immediately retracted her claim.

The same woman also sued Prince Andrew for under age sex on two occasions.

Prince Andrew denies knowing her, and settled the law suit by donating millions of dollars to a non-profit organization created by the woman.

27 posted on 06/07/2025 1:07:34 PM PDT by zeestephen (Trump Landslide? Kamala lost the election by 230,000 votes, in WI, MI, and PA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The Roman empire still exists, this is why there is a Roman Catholic Church.


28 posted on 06/07/2025 3:37:44 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Not a one of those people were elected to anything


29 posted on 06/07/2025 3:50:25 PM PDT by Nifster ( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

Yes


30 posted on 06/07/2025 3:53:36 PM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: algore

Not even close


31 posted on 06/07/2025 3:54:49 PM PDT by Nifster ( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

“Who is lying”

Yes.


32 posted on 06/07/2025 4:04:18 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Well I can see your point. But what if Trump’s priorities are not on cutting spending? If that was his priority he’d have been raging at Johnson and the House republicans to enact the DOGE cuts.

I really don’t want to believe that the president we elected - who was persecuted, shot at, attacked at every opportunity - would hide Epstein material in order to use it himself. I’d prefer that not to be the case. But I have to admit that it is possible, given the behavior of Kash and Bondi.


33 posted on 06/07/2025 6:48:47 PM PDT by happyathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: happyathome
But I have to admit that it is possible, given the behavior of Kash and Bondi.

Joe Biden's handlers would have used that against him. But they didn't. So that argument is not making sense.

34 posted on 06/07/2025 6:50:30 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Not sure I understand your point about Biden.

I was suggesting that Kash and Bondi being confused/evasive about Epstein info might mean that the current administration is using it for their own ends. I hope that is not the case, but the possibility of that being the case is not zero.


35 posted on 06/07/2025 7:06:46 PM PDT by happyathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
Not a one of those people were elected to anything

They wield a pretty big stick anyway because Congress has handed off every responsibility for decisions to the hired bureaucrats that they allow to be protected by unions they never approved and only an idiot would allow.

36 posted on 06/07/2025 9:22:10 PM PDT by itsahoot (Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: happyathome

Thanks for the reply. Whatever the reasons its becoming a bad look for the administration that promised greater transparency and accountability.


37 posted on 06/08/2025 7:58:44 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

38 posted on 06/08/2025 9:45:50 AM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson