We’re not allowed to have dependable energy. Even if this type of hydrogen were to be utilized, the left would figure out a way to ban it.
Determined by leftist shills to be untouchable climate changing greenhouse gas in 3…2….1….
Yet almost all hydrogen today comes from hydrocarbons,
could
“Without emissions “
Idiots.
The emission is water vapor, the most powerful greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.
It’s worse than U-235! Remember the Hindenburg!
Climate hoax extremists who push hydrogen as the “clean” alternative...
Well they are either woefully ignorant or they are hypocrites of the first order.
Burn carbon and you get CO2. Burn hydrogen and you get H2O.
The most potent of the “greenhouse” gasses is actually water (H2O) vapor.
Having declared carbon to be the villain in their story book lives, I guess they just have to believe in hydrogen as the solution, as carbon is the villain.
But I had thought that global warming was the villain!
“Shut up!” they explained.
Burning hydrogen produces water vapor, a greenhouse gas. Have these people thought about the effect of millions of cars and trucks running on hydrogen and producing steam that is expelled into the atmosphere and will warm the planet?
If hydrogen is used to power vehicles, there will be a tank in which the hydrogen is kept under very high pressure. Has anyone thought about what will happen when the vehicle collides with a bridge or another vehicle? Will the pressurized hydrogen be suddenly released from the tank? How much of it will catch fire?
I know of no commercial hydrogen accumulations in the earth. It is such a small molecule that it can only be trapped by salt or basement (think granite). The same goes for helium. The industrial hydrogen is produced from methane.
and the oceans of the world contain 20 million tons of gold ...
Natural Hydrogen trapped under the earths crust is GOOD
Natural gas trapped under the earths crust is BAD
The Hindenburg is BACK, BABY!!!
Strap one on and float down the street! Weeeee..bang.
False, water will be emitted. I'm sure that will be declared a pollutant presently.
Except that the cost is bazillions of dollars.
Unlike the burning of carbon, the burning of hydrogen robs our atmosphere of the oxygen we breathe.
Just like the movie crack in the world.
I see wildly optimistic claims without any actual hydrogen to back them up.
New!
If, in some way, virtually free energy were possible, “free energy” to the public will never be allowed. The peons gotta pay.