|
Posted on 04/30/2025 9:00:22 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
~~Easy St.~~
Thanks for the update on Easy St., I was concerned!
gisd O
Speed bag? I can go with that. Using a muzzard head for a speed bag has a certain appeal. I’ll file that under “available options”.
I hate violence, so I was a little puzzled over the fact that I liked watching— more than once — the Brit decking the invader. But I figured it out. The good guy is just so efficient, so there is no continued beating and no blood flying.
Not close to 8 billion if China real population is closer to 500 million. Population would be 7.2 billion.
That guy is a boxer. No doubt.
MarQ
Your Mom is lucky to have one very kind and sweet child.
I need a clarification on the trade treaty with China. Is is 10/10 or 10/30 for 90 days?
-SB
I remember you posted about this.
But what about the invasion/insurrection? The insurrection act has a lot of information that may be relevant, as in using the military.
https://policy.defense.gov/portals/11/documents/hdasa/references/insurrection_act.pdf
Insurrection Act
10 U.S.C. §§ 331-335
Sec. 331. Federal aid for State governments
Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President
may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be
convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number
requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to
suppress the insurrection.
Sec. 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or
assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable
to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial
proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use
such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress
the rebellion.
Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means,
shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any
insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States
within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege,
immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the
constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right,
privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes
the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the
equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
Sec. 334. Proclamation to disperse
Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under
this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents or those
obstructing the enforcement of the laws to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes
within a limited time.
and this is interesting too:
https://law.justia.com/codes/us/1999/title18/parti/chap115/sec2383
SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
Sec. 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
View Metadata
Download pdf
§2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Breitbart's article about the Dem activists storming the gates of the detention center linked to an Homeland Security X post with the video. I heard Dem Rep. McIver complaining that ICE was falsely claiming she body-slammed someone. McIver said she didn't know what body-slamming was, and wouldn't know how to do that. She said ICE was the one causing the problem.
I couldn't see much in the video at normal speed so I slowed it down. All I see is Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) wearing a bright red blazer and shoving ICE agents out of her way, while two men in suits behind her gingerly try to stop her.
Quote from AOL.COM website: "During a press conference after the incident, McIver claimed she was "assaulted by multiple ICE officers while regional directors of ICE watched it happen."
The first three clips, below are the same incident recorded from 3 different cameras, where she is shoving an officer all the way to the gate opening. Note the two men in suits behind her - they are not involved in the shoving and seem to be trying to restrain her. I wonder if either is Congressional security.
Below, duplicate clips show her shaking off a hand placed on her right arm from behind - probably one of the men accompanying her.
Below, she shoves an officer near the mayor who is being arrested. One (or both men) man behind her tries to restrain her arm and she raises it to shake him off. He may have realized she risked arrest.
The corrupt Congress Critters are just so desperate when it comes to illegals. What was the goal here? Did she want a photo op with the detained? Did she 'need' to tell him/them not to talk because Dems will get them out? Or is it that the Dems are trying to get arrested and racking up 'confrontations' to justify more extreme action later? The video shows her at fault, but part of America still watches the MSM who are featuring accusations and not footage.
From your last link:
Why did Trump, of all people, introduce the St Michael prayer, written by Leo XIII, mere months ago, and to many a person who’d never heard of it before? Perhaps because, as we’ve been hammering home, the real war is not just political, but spiritual, religious even. Perhaps because the veil is thinning, and even those with earthly power can sense the encroaching darkness. Or perhaps because this prayer—ignored by so many modern bishops and priests—still terrifies the enemy it was written to rebuke.
..............
Yes!
My dad was 1st Gen Italian American and once told me he had to answer questions when he enlisted, such as, “Would you be willing to shoot a relative?”
Sure enough, he fought up the bloody boot.
In peace I will both lie down and sleep; for you alone, O Lord, make me dwell in safety. — Psalm 4:8 (ESV)
And while they were gazing into heaven as he went, behold, two men stood by them in white robes, and said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.” — Acts 1:10-11 (ESV)
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 05/01/2025 Vol.507, Q Day 2742, WildHighlander57 wrote: Remember the q drop about three legs of the power elite, one was Rockefeller, another was Rothschild, and what was the third one, Saudi?
Yes.
Triangle Search results on Qalerts.net
Q134
'First time in history' -amazing. So, when did 'history' start with these three in control? Hmmm? :D
..
One thing I noticed is the people behind her. It’s almost like she’s being herded towards the hot point. I’m not excusing her behavior. I just noticed it.
-SB
> And while they were gazing into heaven as he went, behold, two men stood by them in white robes, and said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.” — Acts 1:10-11 (ESV)
That’s heavy. I’m not even sure how that works.
-SB
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
