Posted on 04/28/2025 4:32:19 AM PDT by Red Badger
Why does it have guard rails if it’s autonomous?
People still have to work on it...................
You win the thread!
If a Leftest programed it wouldn’t it surrender the first chance it gets ? LOL
If that’s the case to argue, explain how the will get there and how they play into an overall war plan.
The only case I saw on this thread was where they become part of an amphib group carried in an amphibious assault ship to get marines and supplies quickly ashore. I can see that, but rogue operations in Chinese coastal waters, no way. They would last 5 minutes.
Marketing Lit at its finest.
“this 44-ton vessel could change naval warfare forever.”
Yeah, I think I’ve heard this one before.
Silly headline. 44 tons appears to be the vessel’s payload, not its displacement.
PHM,LCS,DDX,CGX.
If this was the case in the past, the gov. and media would report on the development of the B-29 and the A-bomb, plus Normandy plans, etc.
To save money the DOD bought the chips from the Chinese.
Like the drone Iran took over.
Inside a carrier is how they get there. And you know for a fact the strength of the Chinese PLA there during a conflict, and that those ships would not last 5 minutes, or are you just guessing?
I paced/raced a Gef along the old Hathaway Bridge on my big Yamaha MC when I saw it start out from the Navy base and turned along the bridge route. I was just coming to the bridge at that point and had read in the newspaper that they ere capable of 70 mph. There was no traffic except me so I cranked the throttle as the GEF picked up speed. The GEF was accelerating also and I matched it for a short period then it started pulling away. When I hit 100 mph it was still pulling away and I had to shut down as I as at other the end of the bridge and the Gef was turning hard right as it was running out of water .
They would be targets from both sea and shore. But you didnt answer my question. What mission do they fill as a brown water navy off chinese shores? They would be useful as marine transport, but what else?
The US has tried to employ brown water naval vessels several time. We had hydrofoil Pegasus class vessels. They were not trans ocean worthy and would only have served a purpose as US shore defense, but that assumes we would let an enemy get that close. The US strategy is to take the battle to them, interdict their navy before it gets here.
I see a few spec ops roles this might serve, but still not a whole lot.
I continue to think we are so far ahead of the ChiComs it’s pathetic.
We already have drone autonomous diesel subs that are anti-drone launchers. In a conflict, the ChiCom fleet would never get out of harbor.
Think Taranto.
Automating war is a bad idea.
War without the inherent risk to human participants reduces the moral and political limitations to its instigation.
Good points. I understand radiation, in the gamma ray and X-ray spectrums, because of what I do for a living, but in the electromagnetic spectrum as a whole with what is characterized as EMP...not so much.
From what I understand, it is the transmission over long distances that takes place outside the atmosphere that makes those types of airbursts at that distance so dangerous, because the gamma rays travel such a long way before interacting with the atmosphere and energizing the atmosphere, as opposed to a airburst in the atmosphere or near the ground.
I just know that they test platforms when they are designing and building them, but don’t know to what levels they harden them to.
Wow!
And published “top speeds” for military vessels are less than actuals, routinely, going back to probably the beginning of time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.