Posted on 04/25/2025 4:19:11 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Berlin (AFP) – German chemicals giant Bayer said Friday it could be forced to pull its Roundup weedkiller from the market if it is not able to limit simmering legal troubles.
"We're nearing a point where the litigation industry could force us to even stop selling this vital product," CEO Bill Anderson said at Bayer's annual general meeting.
Bayer has been dogged by lawsuits linked to Roundup since it acquired the US manufacturer Monsanto in a blockbuster deal in 2018.
Claimants have alleged that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, causes blood cancers but Bayer says scientific studies and regulatory approvals show that the weedkiller is safe.
Bayer has battled to draw a line under Roundup litigation, spending more than $10 billion (8.8 billion euros) to date to settle suits alleging that Bayer failed to disclose health risks.
(Excerpt) Read more at france24.com ...
“my method is to use a plastic grocery store...”
You mean plastic bag of course. In many places they are under attack too.
Plastics and Roundup are too immersed in our modern world to be eliminated unscientifically.
Lawfare uses fear not science.
“We have a bottle of roundup here that has zero glyphosate in it.”
Riiiiiiiiiiight. /s
Bayer’s New “Glyphosate-Free” Roundup May Be 45x MORE Toxic Than Before
https://thefiltery.com/glyphosate-free-roundup-more-toxic-than-before/
Round Up isn’t used on lawns.
Bayer: Killing innocent people since the 1930’s.
That’s a BINGO!
“It was manufactured by two German companies: Tesch and Stabenow (which was based in Hamburg) and Degesch (which was based in Dessau). Zyklon“
- from: https://www.britannica.com/science/Zyklon-B
However, according to DuckDuckGo’s AI:
BASF Chemicals in WW2
During World War II, BASF, as part of the conglomerate IG Farben, manufactured a variety of chemicals, including Zyklon B, which was used in the gas chambers of Nazi concentration camps. IG Farben also extensively employed forced and slave labor during this period.
This corrupt move is in favor of the newly patented glufosinate ammonium. Bayer bought Monsanto and already had also patented "glufosinate ammonium ready seed" available.
Poppycock. They're looking to cash in on it.
Stefan Oelrich (Bayer): mRNA vaccines are Gene Therapy Bayer exec on gene therapy, a 41 second clip from his speech to World Health Summit.Nice to say "when you need glyphosate, you need glyphosate" but how many today would say "when you need mRNA jabs, you need mRNA jabs?"
It's about marketing. It's always about marketing.
--- ""We're nearing a point where the litigation industry could force us to even stop selling this vital product...."
Indeed. And just as the chemical business competes for your dollars, so does the litigation industry, the news media, the weapons manufacturers, the social media folks, and so on.
We're their profit centers. We're their data. And we are their objects of marketing.
Do you know if that grain remains viable as seed after glyphosate dessication?
It’s gotta be toxic to kill weeds.
I wonder how many prescription medications people take that are far more risky than glyphosate.
Such as the plant outside Dachau.
Do you have any solid reference to Rockefeller participation in that activity? I've found lots of noise about it, but nothing I would use as a citation.
Read post 9. That was a prescription medication. Probably worse than glyphosate.
Ironically, that image comes from a 2015 article wholly defending the chemical.
The public has learned a lot since then of course (some of the public, not so much).
Oh, please, yes!
Needless killer made even worse with “Roundup ready” seeds.
Ever think of where your nervous tick may have come from?!?
Bayer is not from BASF. They are two diffferent companies. They were formed after WW II when the Allies split up I.G. Farben into three separate companies; Bayer, BASF and Hoechst. I worked for Hoechst for 18 years and had a lot of contact with all three.
The Hoechst part made Zyklon B in a plant I spent time in.
Roundup has been tested and retested as to its safety in the food chain. Its elimination would be an agricultural disaster for the US. Corn, soy beans and cotton would lose significant crop yields if it were banned.
The keys to the Roundup action are the roundup-resistant seeds Monsanto developed that allow the weeds to be killed and the crop to survive. DuPont had similar products.
The fact that Bayer could afford the 10B tax on the product is a neasure of how profitable this is. The farmers are willing to pay to get the yield.
Lawyers are now mining the ignorance and fears of US juries to get their cut and kill a valuable technology.
The witch hunt against Roundup started with the environmental Luddites who are opposed in principle to large scale, technology intensive production agriculture -- and a lot of that came originally from the Europeans who were desperately seeking non-tariff trade barriers to allow European microfarms to stay in business vs. modern agriculture in the U.S., Canada, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, and the Ukraine.
Buy a clue. You don't lease a new $400,000 combine every three years to farm 20 acres. So how does the 20 acre gardener stay in business and earn a decent living against modern production agriculture? Answer: the same way a home woodworking enthusiast who makes furniture, or the people who enjoy hand weaving on old fashioned looms, or mechanically minded tinkerers who would like to build cars in a machine shed in back might stay in business: suppression of the competition and massive subsidies, if anyone were fool enough to arrange an entire economy that way. (Ooooh, just think of all the jobs! Bernie Sanders is sold.) Let's hear it for artisanal production!!!!
The WTO limited trade distorting tariffs on agricultural products. But France, the UK, etc. don't have production agriculture as we understand it. They have landscape gardening programs that produce food on the side. They can get reasonably high yields because farmers can intensively cultivate their little 20-40 acre truck gardens, but they can't live on that. They live on government subsidies under the EU's common agricultural program in which they are paid for providing "social benefits" such as scenic hedgerows, stone walls dividing tiny plots, lots of weed and insect habitat, etc.
Try restructuring Iowa and Nebraska around 20-40 acre hobby farms. Yes, that would provide lots of employment as we restored a premodern peasant class. But then we would have to pay them massive social benefits welfare benefits to give them a middle class life. You can't have cute Swiss cows grazing on picturesque Swiss mountainsides if Swiss farmers had to compete with Wisconsin and Iowa. So: how could they keep the evil Americans out?
The solution: for a start, turn Roundup into a boogeyman and demonize Monsanto. The first wave of GMO crops were grains genetically modified to be Roundup tolerant. Farmers could shift to low-till and no-till farming systems (which reduce passes over the field, slash fuel consumption, help prevent soil erosion, and improve moisture retention). Plant the GMO corn and soybeans. When plants started to emerge, spray the field with Roundup, which kills all the weeds while the corn and soybeans thrive. That also eliminates a lot of insect habitat. It boosts productivity all around. Farmers in the U.S. aren't paid for providing insect habitat. Farmers in the EU are. Everything flows from that. The radical, anti-modern agriculture enviros ate that up because almost no environmental activists have ever done a lick of real work (let alone spend all day every day doing drudge labor in the fields), and they have consistently lied through their teeth about every imaginary hobgoblin they can conjure up. They get away with it because the press is incompetent, corrupt, ideologically driven, and lazy.
And then the lawyers step in to monetize the lies. That's lawfare.
Oh, I am aware.
This is all interconnected (’roundup’, jabs, statins, etc.).
I hearken to my prior & persistent lambasting of RFK Jr, whose immediate priority is food dyes.
Ironically, DOGE hasn’t been at NIH yet; I wonder why (that’s not sarcasm).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.