Posted on 04/20/2025 6:43:52 PM PDT by grundle
According to the Migration Policy Institute and ACLU, approximately 75% of deportations under the Obama administration (2009–2017) were nonjudicial removals, meaning they bypassed immigration court hearings and judicial oversight.
In FY 2012 alone, 313,000 nonjudicial removals occurred, compared to 1,400 in 1995.
These removals often involved "expedited removal" or "administrative removal," where Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents, such as Border Patrol or ICE officers, made decisions without involving an immigration judge.
Did you hear one word about this from the media?
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Foreigners in the United States ILLEGALLY are not supposed to be covered by the U.S. Constitution. Dew process my arse. They need to go process their dew by someone else’s bushes.
No never did
Somebody sue Obama to go get his deportees back from wherever they were sent.
Garcia was ordered deported by 2 different immigration judges. He had his due process.
I’m getting fuzzy on the details right now. Is it all gang members that were being sent to CECOT, or just MS-13?
Were the Tren de Aragua being sent back to Venezuela where Maduro trained them in prison, set them free, equipped them, and sent them into the US to wreak havoc?
And now has SCOTUS said we can’t deport any gang member at all without a court hearing?
Do we have to have a court hearing for all the people who are being deported simply for coming here illegally? Which would be even more than you ever had to do for the past 30 years? Since when did that ever change? If the 14th Amendment allowed “due process” to be done by border agents finding probable cause of illegal entry, then why does “due process” suddenly change to court proceedings?
AI Overview
The removal of Elian Gonzalez from his home in Miami, Florida, on April 21, 2000,
by the U.S. government was not a judicial process, but rather a nonjudicial action taken
by the Department of Justice to enforce a previous decision to return the child
to his father in Cuba 
My, how time flies.
If he had to be dragged or tossed off then he might have a case.
There are several reasons why not.
“Did you hear one word about this from the media?”
btt
The idea of a country only repelling an invading force by providing one-by-one “due process” to each militant first is insane. The death to our nation.
But now we’ve got all 9 Supremes insisting on it?!?
Wholeheartedly agree. The liberal media are traitors, plain and simple, bought off by probably the Chinese.
1.5M views so far...
Wonder if Elon Musk has replied and/or retreated it...
That’s because Obama REDEFINED the term “deportation” to include “turn arounds”.
So people who were caught at the border by Border Patrol were turned right back around and sent back into Mexico were listed as “deportations” by the Obama Administration.
There was very little ACTUAL deportation by the Obama Administration.
was there a fence?
Somebody ping John Roberts
https://infographicsite.com/infographic/deportations-under-us-presidents-statistics/
I was a Border Patrol Agent for almost 30 years. I deported thousands of illegal aliens based solely on probable cause of illegal entry. No court hearing required.
And in that 30 years how many of those were more than 100 miles from the border and of a subject resident in the United States for more than two years?
Be serious. You are talking about apprehension in the 100 mile zone, something totally irrelevant to the Abrego case.
https://law.justia.com/cfr/title08/8-1.0.1.2.57.0.1.1.html
8 CFR 287.1
§ 287.1 Definitions.(a)(1) External boundary. The term external boundary, as used in section 287(a)(3) of the Act, means the land boundaries and the territorial sea of the United States extending 12 nautical miles from the baselines of the United States determined in accordance with international law.
(2) Reasonable distance. The term reasonable distance, as used in section 287(a) (3) of the Act, means within 100 air miles from any external boundary of the United States or any shorter distance which may be fixed by the chief patrol agent for CBP, or the special agent in charge for ICE, or, so far as the power to board and search aircraft is concerned any distance fixed pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Reasonable distance; fixing by chief patrol agents and special agents in charge. In fixing distances not exceeding 100 air miles pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, chief patrol agents and special agents in charge shall take into consideration topography, confluence of arteries of transportation leading from external boundaries, density of population, possible inconvenience to the traveling public, types of conveyances used, and reliable information as to movements of persons effecting illegal entry into the United States: Provided, That whenever in the opinion of a chief patrol agent or special agent in charge a distance in his or her sector or district of more than 100 air miles from any external boundary of the United States would because of unusual circumstances be reasonable, such chief patrol agent or special agent in charge shall forward a complete report with respect to the matter to the Commissioner of CBP, or the Assistant Secretary for ICE, as appropriate, who may, if he determines that such action is justified, declare such distance to be reasonable.
Deportation ceased to be a legal term in 1996. It is now removal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.