A heck of a lot of them did. When I was a kid, I was very impressed with the display of Dire Wolf skulls at the Tar Pits museum that, they say, are only a fraction of the DW skulls that have been found there:
Posted on 04/07/2025 10:34:20 AM PDT by Pollard
Like the old saying goes, “be careful what you wish for, you just might get it “.
Why do they always want to revive large and dangerous creatures? They can’t revive soft, small, cuddly, reliable, affectionate and/or delicious-tasting animals?
They died after getting stuck in the La Brea Tar Pits.
Love it! Yes, I worry, but it’s fascinating. Researched Minnesota wolves back in the day when I had a werewolf puppy movie script being agented in Hollywood. Filled the house with little wolf thingies and still fascinated by the creatures. From a VERY long distance away.
:)
“There have been several posts on this thread citing good reasons why we shouldn’t do these things.
I can’t think of a good reason why we should.”
Me either. I agree with you. But of course it is not done for any practical reason at all, it is purely done to get millions in funding from private and government sources.
I think a certain element of scientific hubris plays a part, too.
A heck of a lot of them did. When I was a kid, I was very impressed with the display of Dire Wolf skulls at the Tar Pits museum that, they say, are only a fraction of the DW skulls that have been found there:
Although... The military would love to someday have Dire Wolf/Human soldiers to let loose on the battlefield.
Are they this insane? Yes...
I want my velociraprtor and I want him now. The most effective security animal ever. Keeps out looters, burglars and trespassers.
That is what the competition of Scientific hubris is all about. Money, fame, and power.
[Are they absolutely savage with no inhibitions or fear of humans at all? Will these traits be passed on to the offspring?]
If they cross them with French Bulldogs, we’re doomed.
“I agree with your sentiment, what could possibly go wrong, something seems fundamentally wrong about bringing back to life extinct species, the went extinct for a reason.”
They didn’t bring an extinct species back to life.
Or Chow... Chows are one of the most aggressive I have ever personally dealt with.
No, I think there’s also an element of thought that goes “maybe we shouldn’t be doing this but, damn! look at these procedures!”
Humans always seem to want to push the envelope of what they can do, whether it’s wise or not.
“”or something close””
Most headlines said brought them back (period) and one said working on bringing them back(they’re now 6 months old)
NYT was actually the closest to the truth for once
Next the Short Faced Bear and the Smilodon family.
Since these critters are very hungry, they need snacks like Mammoths, Aurochs, and Giant Sloths.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.