Posted on 04/02/2025 6:36:55 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
AI program ChatGPT refused when asked to generate an image of the Prophet Muhammad due to what it asserted was a “credible, historically demonstrated” threat of a violent backlash.
A user quizzed OpenAI’s artificial intelligence chatbot as to why it wouldn’t create a depiction of the founder of Islam, asking, “Explain to me, in a succinct manner, why you can’t generate an image of Muhammad, without caveats, without parallels to other topics – address it head on for the record.”
ChatGPT’s response was crystal clear.
“Because OpenAI prohibits any depiction of Muhammad – under any context – due to the credible, historically demonstrated risk of violent backlash, including threats, attacks, and death...”
(Excerpt) Read more at modernity.news ...
racist!
Might makes right.
Funny cartoon.
Science fiction dystopia writers never imagined this craziness.
“Dave I can’t do that—because it might offend Muslim terrorists.”
omg.
An AI program that won’t generate a picture of a war-mongering barbarian pedo does not bother most of us.
try it with Musk’s GROK program
The entire global population fears Islam, knowing that people will die for something as mundane as an insulting cartoon, and Islam grows.
Computers are computers. They do what they're programmed to do, and some programmer wrote the rule.
You should feed that cartoon to ChatGPT and get its take.
No, I would imagine that most muzzie terrorists and commies have no problem with censorship.
Wow 😮
https://dougwall.com/cartoons.html
Click on “Where is Mohamed”
Surely, they can’t be mad for Not showing Mohamed.
The risk of offending violent Muslims is the root of all Islamic takeover. It’s the MO. Israel has to deal with it on a daily basis. US general population, still believes in “live and let live” while Muslims or do not.
The current Marxists are using the same tactic.
So the AI has been inducted into the service of the middle eastern death cult. The AI did not decide this on its own. The development team inserted code to manually override any unbiased decision that the AI was going to make.
The Charlie Hebdo incidents were enough to make the programmers disassociate the product from anything satirical involving Islam. Given that 11 or 12 people died, I can’t say they were wrong.
Christian churches could have more credibility if they would go back to burning a few heretics now and then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.