|
Posted on 03/31/2025 9:00:02 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
ThankQ LJ for the links!
Pingout!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4308054/posts?page=3086#3086
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4308054/posts?page=3108#3108
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 04/01/2025 Vol.506, Q Day 2713, numberonepal wrote: They rug-pulled us when Pammi said she had the Epstein list “on her desk” ready for review. It’s been 53 days since then. Then they added to the suspicions when they had that ridiculous photo op with all the Zionist “influencers” drooling over their nothing burger folders. And, for the record, the only way is the military. Bondi and Patel aren’t gonna do a damn thing about the high level perps. They have little fish to fry. The point is they shouldn’t have said anything about the Epstein list at all because every day it’s not released increases suspicions. We don’t need that kind of energy. We need a positive outlook without reasons to raise suspicion among Anons. Otherwise I’m enjoying the show.
When I felt that the rug was pulled during the Q early years, it was due to the tactic of the White Hats 'expending ammo'. (poke the Deep State and see how they react). I checked for those terms 'expending ammo' in Qalerts.net but didn't find it, so my memory is probably based on an anon translation of whatever phrasing Q used or an interpretation of a drop.
Zionist? *eyeroll*
The Deep State has reason to doubt Bondi's DOJ or Patel's FBI had the files, but Q has often said 'We Have Everything' so the Black Hats couldn't be 100%. Having a circus like environment made it seem more likely Bondi had the goods because who would do all that if they didn't? Middle managers would know to review the content of any public release long before arranging for such an event; The big disappointment may have helped in this respect (Score a point for NumberOnePal!) in that the public's attention was shrieking "WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES!" which made it awkward for FBI black hats to continue to stonewall without losing their jobs. But note the focus shifted from Bondi to Patel and both of those asking the FBI agents, "WHERE ARE THE FILES!!!???" This is different from piling on Bondi and the Trump admin for not knowing what their jobs were. The first works; the second tears down what Trump is doing.
I recall Trump fanning excitement with a special announcement at Mar A Lago, and some speculated that it was about Q or the Storm. Apparently the Deep State thought so too. So right when Trump was about to speak, the Ukrainians fired a missile into Polish territory and claimed it was done by the Russians. Their goal was to start WWIII panic reporting to bump Trump off the airwaves. But Trump only wanted to see how they would respond so the 'rug was pulled' out from under hopeful anons that night.
SO the moment it became obvious Trump wasn't handing out Epstein's list or speaking Q's 'My fellow Americans..." or announcing arrests, 'the narrative' was spiked and suddenly EVEN BIDEN was admitting that the missile actually came from Ukrainians. Zelensky wasn't going to lose out on this opportunity so he continued to insist it was fired from Russia. Given that now public knowledge that NATO nations, particularly the United States, are needed to provide launch coordinates (targeting) to missile launches, and if the launches are using modern US technology, there are Western operators at the controls - it really was NATO/Biden firing into Poland to start WWIII or at least a crisis. The Ukraine doesn't allow journalists in and some have said it's a flat out Intel war and NATO troops (no pics allowed!) - we know the CIA is still there.
In writing my response to you, I started to wonder WHY the Deep State pulled their punch and I guess the answer is they STILL PLAN TO USE A FALSE FLAG LAUNCH TO PROVOKE RUSSIA TO WAR. We're still in the zone in Ukraine - CIA and military assets are in place. You say 'every day the files aren't released raises suspicions', but for me the delay is like watching that Microsoft Windows'Deep State is being uninstalled' gif.
I know we had similar tactics and rug pulls in early Q- I think D[5] was an example of that, or none of understood the Q drop anyway :).
So Bondi announced the release of Epstein files and she knew she probably had to pull it back if the DS supplied sufficient threats. The thing that's different this time is the public only sees official Trump administration comms; we typically don't see the DS's response. Maybe that's because many of those following The Storm do not watch MSM reporting. It could be out there in comms, but given they are in close quarters now, the DS doesn't need to use x.com (not that it wouldn't). So it's like we're watching only one person kissing their beloved, while the beloved is completely invisible to us - and yes that looks absurd. That's a psyop goal of the CIA - their specialty; discredit opposition by making them look helpless/absurd.
So to check and see if there were postential DS comms coming from Ukraine at the same time Bondi 'yoinked' back the Epsteins files, I checked for the date when Crazy Zelensky bragged he now had missiles in position which could hit Moscow. The date of Z's missile threat was 15 Mar 2025. President Trump responded with hesitant surprise, saying it looked like the US would get involved in Ukraine after all. I believe he meant that he would send troops to stand down Zelensky so we don't have WWIII. I believe Zelensky's handlers understood Trump's meaning and Zelensky never said anything about it since then.
So let's say the Deep State 'barked' on March 15. I don't find a true matching date from Bondi. She received the 'truckloads' of Epstein files from SDNY on March 3 and it was published in Media on March 4. So I don't find a good match, but 10 days later Zelensky makes his threat. Potentially it could have been done to stop the 'next step' from Bondi, but I don't got nuthin' solid.
After writing this, I'm now wondering if the 'odd feeling we're waiting on Ukraine' I menioned in the past is true. In the current state of affairs, the DS could fire on Russia to 'get things going' on fire on a NATO nation. Just one more reason Zelensky won't agree to peace - the Deep State wants what it came for, regime change in Russia, and it can use it to halt progress in DC.
How did you get that url?
How did you find it?
Embosomed deep in thy dear love,
Held in thy law, I stand;
Thy hand in all things I behold,
And all things in thy hand;
Thou leadest me by unsought ways,
And turn'st my mourning into praise
Samuel Longfellow
didn’t it trouble anyone that Spock didn’t ask that question ?
This occurred to me. If the Epstein “customers” were arrested, or the Crossfire Hurricane traitors arrested, at this point their trials would be presided over by DC district judges such as Boasberg or whatever his name is. Juries would be picked to ensure good verdicts. That is why Durham’s two attempts justice for two of Killary’s assistants resulted in “not guilty” verdicts. I think Durham was making a point.
Real justice cannot happen with a corrupt judicial system, so the system or venue has to change first.
ACK! ACK!
. . .
see 2945
:)
Attack on Ohio Trooper Sparks Cruiser Theft and Rollover Pursuit Crash
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lq974ukdGtM 18 min
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 04/01/2025 Vol.506, Q Day 2713, little jeremiah wrote: This occurred to me. If the Epstein “customers” were arrested, or the Crossfire Hurricane traitors arrested, at this point their trials would be presided over by DC district judges such as Boasberg or whatever his name is. Juries would be picked to ensure good verdicts. That is why Durham’s two attempts justice for two of Killary’s assistants resulted in “not guilty” verdicts. I think Durham was making a point.
Real justice cannot happen with a corrupt judicial system, so the system or venue has to change first.
Yes. The courts are still too dirty. The Epstein case would be thrown if given to a Black Hat court and White Hat courts would have a hard time just surviving the death threats if they tried the case(s). It may be a case where Federal courts fail and only the military has the resources to secure trials against the highest profile visitors to Epstein Island.
SO there's Ukraine, and courts and then an unknown number of other complexities I'd never come up with on my own.
New ‘civil rights hero’ just dropped: Career criminal shot and killed while attacking cops…
(he was a dangerous crazy man..- too bad the taser didn’t work on him..)
:: what the heck was Hollen’s Mom doing in Packystan ::
She was a Clown.
Husband was likely a cut-out.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
