Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/22/2025 4:59:49 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger
Generally the eyeball BMI method never fails.

The worst way is to ask your spouse.

2 posted on 03/22/2025 5:01:19 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and His mercy endureth forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Long-winded reference to the water displacement method.


3 posted on 03/22/2025 5:07:49 PM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

4 posted on 03/22/2025 5:09:39 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

When Michael Jordan was still playing basketball, the Wizards of Smart ‘updated’ the BMI index, and as a result, Jordan would have been classified as obese.


5 posted on 03/22/2025 5:12:21 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The measurement is an AVERAGE based upon an insurance study of people back in the 1930s (or 40s). Yes, if you’re a body builder then you’ll have more muscle weight which will throw the measurement off. But if you’re a typical human being who doesn’t work out than the measurements are pretty accurate.
If you’re 5’10, 210lbs and not built like Arnold Schwarzenegger you’re not bulky - you’re obese!


6 posted on 03/22/2025 5:15:36 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Spoiler alert: the crown was not pure gold.


10 posted on 03/22/2025 5:31:05 PM PDT by CtBigPat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

My son in high school who was very fit and built very solid, was considered *obese* by the BMI.

Ridiculous as he had almost no fat on him and he was very active physically.

Unfortunately, things have changed and genetics and a sedentary desk job caught up with him


11 posted on 03/22/2025 5:33:50 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Does this shirt make me look obese?


12 posted on 03/22/2025 5:38:51 PM PDT by BipolarBob (My ex said I was a psychopath. I said at least I'm on a path because she's off the rails crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

BMI sure causes a lot of people to get their panties in a wad, mostly because it tells them what they don’t want to hear...that they’re too fat. Everybody knows it’s not a perfect measurement of body fat, it was never meant to be. It’s just a general screening tool. If you know your weight and height then you know your BMI, it takes seconds and costs nothing. Weighing in water takes a special apparatus, pool, and time. A DEXA scan is even better but guess what it takes? Time and money. BMI is a cheap and easy way to tell the doctor he might want to look for other things, by itself it means nothing but a lot of people sure don’t like to hear it.


13 posted on 03/22/2025 5:39:16 PM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

BMI just never made sense to me on a units basis.


15 posted on 03/22/2025 5:41:27 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

BMI is, and always has been, a joke. According to BMI, pretty much every professional athlete (or anyone with a muscular build) is “obese”. It is a useless measurement.


19 posted on 03/22/2025 6:01:09 PM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Ya gotta look like a Kenyan marathoner to pass the BMI chart.


21 posted on 03/22/2025 6:37:10 PM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

When I see a fat person, I don’t need a measuring tape or BMI index to figure it out.

And if you’re fat and you can’t figure that out on your own... There is nothing in this world that will help you, except to stop stuffing your face with food.


23 posted on 03/22/2025 6:45:17 PM PDT by jerod (Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Bmi chart always indicates I’m too short


25 posted on 03/22/2025 7:14:13 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️ LIFE )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
The Body Mass Index has always been a fundamentally flawed metric in that it relies on the cross-sectional area of a body instead of the total volume. Since three-dimensional bodies have three dimensions, only using the square of height instead of the cube adversely penalizes taller people.

A subject is first weighed in normal conditions and then reweighed while sitting completely submerged on an underwater chair attached to a set of scales. The differences in the dry and underwater weight measurements can then be used to calculate the buoyant force acting on the person while under water, which in turn can be used to determine their volume, given the known density of water.

This system for measuring body density is poorly designed and won't work unless the each person being measured floods their lungs with water. If they don't drown themselves, they will be able to game the system by exhaling before the test, thus reducing their buoyancy and increasing their submerged weight over someone identical who doesn't exhale. If our lungs are filled with air, we are all variably buoyant and thus, inconsistently dense. It is doubtful the inventor of this approach has ever actually tested anyone in this way.

42 posted on 03/23/2025 11:08:43 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson