Measles outbreak leads to high demand for MMR vaccine

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Measles outbreak leads to high demand for MMR vaccine, hecticskeptic wrote:
From 2021 to present, all reports of Adverse Events (Post MMR vaccination) made to
CDC/FDA Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’m trying to understand something... isn’t this data meaningless without also having the breakdown of how many people got each specific vaccine? Obviously Merck has the most adverse reactions to the MMR vaccination... but perhaps the number who got the Merck one was 10 times all the other ones combined.
Market share responses, or total dose responses are best whenever I can get them, (for C19 I could get general estimates) but in the case of many Pharma, they rarely expose their market share.
I can say MERCK likely had the most doses by far because they started earlier (invented in the 70's). But I took the time to look at disabled, deaths, life threatening injuries over time and in my opionion, given '50 deaths used to get a product pulled off market', Merck was allowed some leniency for quite some time. Sadly, this leniency sounds familiar (see links below) in that Merck seems to have been able to operate without interference although there were serious questions about how the claims of 'safe and effective' hold up to inspection.
Fresh on the heels of Covid19 vax pushing, the MSM is now fanning the flames of panic. The efficacy and safety of MMR is questioned quietly, not in the MSM.
Then THere's this:
Since the late 1990s, Merck has known that its measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is significantly less effective than the company states on its product license and product insert.
Given that Merck’s own test results for the vaccine fell outside the specifications, or acceptance criteria established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for drug applications, the production of this vaccine should have stopped, Merck should have suspended sales and the defective vaccine should have been withdrawn from the market with a product recall.
In April 2012, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, virologists working for Merck in Pennsylvania — who became whistleblowers — filed two separate lawsuits against the pharmaceutical giant alleging it falsified research data, enabling it to develop a monopoly on the MMR vaccine and block any competition.
Evidence provided in expert witness reports from Dr. David A. Kessler, ex-commissioner of the FDA, Dr. Robert Malone and Merck’s own internal documents described the vaccine as “misbranded,” “out of compliance” and “non-marketable.”
According to witnesses and legal counsel for the whistleblowers, Merck scientists resorted to “falsifying data and destroying unfavorable data.”
An ineffective mumps vaccine is dangerous. Recipients of the vaccine are not protected or become susceptible to mumps again at an older age, leading to outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations.
SNIP
In United States ex rel. Krahling v. Merck & Co., Krahling and Wlochowski have put compelling evidence of mumps vaccine fraud before the federal court in Philadelphia.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/philadelphia-3rd-circuit-merck-mmr-vaccine-fraud-case/
General concerns re MMR vaccines.

4/4/2019
MMR Vaccine’s Poison Pill: Mumps After Puberty, Reduced Testosterone and Sperm Counts
Across the country, frenzied legislators are responding to the pharmaceutical industry’s orchestrated fear campaign around measles by seeking to impose further mandating of Merck’s measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Although ongoing mumps outbreaks involving thousands of at-risk adolescents and young adults completely dwarf the number of measles cases, no one is covering the mumps story—because it will expose the fact that Merck has been in court for over eight years due to scientists blowing the whistle on Merck’s fabrication and falsification of the effectiveness of the mumps component of its MMR vaccine.

7/27/2018
Failing MMR? Mumps Outbreaks in Vaccinated Population
Mumps outbreaks among vaccinated persons in university settings have increased. In 2016, large mumps outbreaks occurred at four Indiana universities. At some universities documentation of receipt of 2 doses of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) was not available and required substantial personnel time to verify. Implementation of policies for excluding susceptible persons from classes […]
4/12/2019
Shocking MMR Vaccine Trial Results Released Via FOIA
In the video, Del Bigtree explains the MMR preclinical trials.
3/7/2019
New Danish MMR Study Shows Autism Rate of 1 in 100—CDC Should Rush to Denmark!
COPENHAGEN, Denmark—We have another “Danish Study” that will invariably be all the talk. It’s too bad no one reads (or understands) the details about these studies that are both funded and researched by vaccine companies (this one is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and research completed by Danish vaccine maker Statens Serum Institut.)
1/14/2025
No Proof MMR Vaccine Is ‘Safer’ than Measles, Mumps or Rubella Infection, Physician Group Says
The risk of permanent disability or death from the MMR vaccine may be greater than the risk from a measles, mumps or rubella infection because large enough vaccine safety studies haven’t been done, according to a collection of new documents released by Physicians for Informed Consent.
~~~~
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/weeding-vaccine-toxins-mmr-glyphosate-health-generation/
Interestingly, of all the vaccines we tested, MMR stood out as consistently having the highest level of glyphosate contamination. This fact may help explain why the MMR vaccine, which contains neither mercury nor aluminum, has been implicated so often in vaccine injury and autism.
I'm skeptical now of vaccines post Fauci because he said all vaccines in the US going forward would be mRNA, and they won't tell us which, if any are based on mRNA.
I came across a 1978 insert for MERCK's MMR in case anyone wants to look at adverse events/contraindications
https://www.fda.gov/media/75191/download

Thankyou very much for that comprehensive reply. It’s quite informative and helpful....

This issue of measles, vaccines, immunity, autism, effectiveness (and for how long), risks and benefits etc. is something that has not been on my radar for quite a long time but it suddenly is in my face. Here’s my situation... I have two married sons. One has four children (including one that is under 6 months) and they have been living overseas..... and generally to the extent possible, the parents have shied away from anything like vaccines for their children that they don’t believe are important/essential, aren’t necessarily required or they believe are too risky. In my opinion, they have been excellent parents in all regards. The other son is married to a nurse-practitioner and they have children including one who is about one year old. I might be wrong to characterize my son’s NP wife this way but I would suggest that she is a big big proponent of getting every vaccine imaginable. I got into many battles with her over how the entire Covid19 thing was handled and particularly so with the so-called ‘vaccine’. For the record, I wouldn’t touch the EGT with a 10 foot pole and I think I can say that particularly with all the current reports of turbo-cancers, my position has proved to be the completely correct one.

The son with the four children is moving back to the States this year and this has set off a big debate from the son and his wife nurse-practitioner who already live here. Basically, they are refusing to let the children get together unless the children coming from overseas are vaccinated and the current issue on the table is this one about measles. My opinion is that if a vaccine for measles is effective, why should they worry if their children play with children who are not vaccinated? My personal opinion is that the son with the four children who aren’t vaccinated (except for perhaps those vaccines that are totally mandatory) is absolutely right to be reticent about getting every shot imaginable for the children. I am not in the medical field but I’m totally concerned about things I have no understanding about and especially, the unbelievable increase in autism when comparing today to when I grew up in the 60s... which seems to be associated with vaccines but arguably, it could be something else.

Anyway, I never asked for this but here I am. What I’ve been doing is compiling medical papers that are relevant to my belief/concerns as related to this issue... serious medical papers are the only thing I would share with my family since of course, everything else can be manipulated/biased. Well, we know that ‘serious medical papers’ can be manipulated/biased as well but my sons and their wives are all quite well educated so I don’t just put ‘articles of stuff’ under their noses and ask them ‘what they think of this.’

Thanks for reading this...I’ve read a lot of your posts over the years and have great respect for what you have to say. If you have any suggestions on medical papers that address this situation head on, I would be more than grateful. However, like anything, I know that this can take a very long time so I’m hoping that you have a listing of some that address this sort of topic. If you don’t already have something like this put together already, I certainly don’t want to burden you with a request that is too time-consuming. Thanks.

I don't have anything concise or handy (sorry!). You might have a look at this legal case in which they collected information comparing unvaccinated populations to vaccinated populations. Some of the small print is worth squinting at, in addition to the charts/graphs.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3949520/posts

The basic overview is that unvaccinated populations have far less chronic disease.
To me, it looks like some vaccines began to be toxic or weaponized starting around 1993; I say this as a result of looking over all the graphs and tables at the original, and my work researching the CDC, FDA and NIH.

In 1993, the CDC started their own 501(c)3 from which it receives donations from Pharmas. The NIH started their 501(c)3 around the same year, and it 'partners' with the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.

Long before then, in 1980, the Bahy-Dole act made it possible for our FDA and other government officials (looking at you, Fauci) to personally profit from patenting drugs which American tax payer dollars were used to develop. This Act put Pharma in bed with the FDA, and now there is no 3rd party testing of the drugs or vaccines developed. The pharmas self report, or they are supposed to.

The FDA had reason to know, based on the reports submitted to them, that the COvid 'vaccines' were not effective. The FDA filings for Moderna and PFizer specified that they were not tested to determine their impact on 'infectivity'. Plus, the results were alarming as to safety. As a result, the FDA/Pharmas tried to prevent the public from seeing their documentation for 75 years.

Court cases finally broke the documentation free from concealment and then they tried to slow walk releases. Feminist/Writer Naomi Wolf was concerned about this whole mess and so she became the representative for a crowd sourced group of physicians and researchers combing through the files and explaining what's in the FOIA documents Pfizer didn't want us to see. It's bad.

She is attacked for being a lefty, a feminist, a person with no medical training etc., but she isn't determining the facts/truth of lab testing and documentation. All of the doctors and researchers would be fired and black listed if they put their own names on their investigation of the pharma files, so Naomi Wolf is the mouthpeice.

Wolf has written a book about the findings, and maybe that's the best way to reach your loved ones, but you don't need the book as she has been posting her reports online - and linking to other reports.

Here's a few threads about her work re Pfizer's C19 'shot':

Crime of the Century?-Naomi Wolf delivers the harrowing facts about the Pfizer jab
	11/22/2024 7:57:56 AM PST · by SJackson · 74 replies Frontpagemagazine ^ \| November 22, 2024 \| Bruce Bawer

Dr. Naomi Wolf: Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, As Evidenced By Its Own Documents Targets Reproductive Cycle of Women
	06/03/2023 1:35:50 AM PDT · by spirited irish · 69 replies PatriotandLiberty ^ \| 6/2/23 \| Dr Naomi Wolf

Naomi Wolfe accuses the CDC Director of Murder (Sunbray)
	05/07/2023 6:19:49 AM PDT · by bray · 17 replies www.brayincandy.com ^ \| 5/7/23 \| bray

‘The greatest crime against humanity’ in history: Naomi Wolf’s 11 revelations from Pfizer vaccine documents
	04/27/2023 6:54:48 AM PDT · by george76 · 31 replies Life Site News ^ \| Apr 24, 2023 \| Patrick Delaney

So not all vaccines are bad, but they have changed over the years. Physicians and researchers who raise concerns about toxic adjuvants ('push' fluid that carries the vaccine into your veins) are definitely discredited if not stripped of their medical credentials. We as consumers have to be cautious and research anything anyone is going to prescribe, apply, inject etc. because times have changed.

JFK Jr. is an attorney who took on the pharmas and wrote a book about Fauci that could be used, IMHO, to prosecute. It's worth a read to get the scope of corruption in the medical regime.

So anyone getting 'shots' needs to research exactly which one being recommended - you can't trust doctors to recommend them unless you are THISCLOSE to that doctor, because during Covid19 doctors were given lucrative incentives to vaccinate their patients. I believe there's pressure on many docs to make sure their patients follow the CDC or other recommendations for the stated purpose of maintaining public health and reducing illness costs to individuals, employers, insurance companies etc. But given people like Fauci have saturated the medical community for decades, buyer beware.

Fauci was, before he stepped down, the highest paid employee in the federal government (yes, higher pay than the President).

PS: I've been researching this stuff for a few years now and whenever someone says, "Well I guess you wouldn't mind having polio then!" to someone cautious of vaccines, some other FReepers say that the polio vaccine was the problem, not the solution. Again, it would take research to check this out, but given the first link talks about the significant erradication of Diptheria BEFORE the diptheria vax was released, citing prior stories about how vaxxes 'saved us all' or referring to our own childhood vaccines (prior to 1993) are not to be taken at face value.

Here's a thread I came across - for C19, the vaccine is licensed but not administered. The FDA made a big deal about C19 vax being licensed and Biden regime basically said those refusing an experimental vax to maintain employment or military service on the grounds it was experimental could no longer refuse the vax. However, the vax they put in your arm is not the licensed version - they inject the experimental version. It can be hard to tell, but the fact is that the pharmas are exempt from liability for the EUA version (experimental) but would be liable for the licensed version. That's why the CDC pushed to get the C19 on the schedule for children. Once it's on the childhood vaccine schedule, the pharmas are not liable for harm. Something to keep in mind....

Life Insurance Company Denies Payout for Vaccine Death, Labels it “Voluntary Suicide”

02/25/2025 4:44:32 AM PST · by Sam77 · 37 replies

Disswire.com ^ | 25 Febraury 2025 | Bradley Greer

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.