The same is true for men. They have adult genitalia but are little boys intellectually/behaviorally. All they are good for is collecting neck tattoos and children from different women.
Uneducated and uncultured, they do not know how to set priorities. Furthermore, their value system is all messed up (teaching that some value systems are better than others is wrong - falls under ethnocentrism), and that leads to a long term negative outcome both in marriage and with raising children. Even factors such as crime rates, suicide etc. are related. Wealth does not create culture, but culture does create wealth.
As Mr. Kevin Samuels frequently pointed out, 80% of all illegitimate Black babies were sired by less than 20% of all Black men. Most Black men are side-lined. (I assume that the figures are similar for the non-Black population.)
You are seeing only the most-conspicuous top-performers (in producing illegitimate children), and then making a blanket judgement about all men.
Faulty logic!
Regards,
The 80% of young men who have been sidelined by the "Chads" monopolizing the "dating" market and building informal "harems" are not at fault for the rotten state of the current Sexual Marketplace.
They bear little to no guilt for the fact that many young women are accruing "body-counts" in the double digits, thus ruining their subsequent pair-bonding ability (men are less affected by casual sex, while women suffer neurological damage from it).
Admittedly: These disenfranchised young men then turn to video games, online porn, and other unproductive activities as an Ersatzhandlung. This is both sad on an individual level and a concern on a societal level.
But it is unfair to blame these disenfranchised young men for the ills of the current "dating" scene.
Regards,