Posted on 02/09/2025 5:27:51 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Donald Trump could be poised to pull back the curtain on UFOs, according to an expert.
Dr Steven Greer, one of the driving forces behind the UFO disclosure movement, claims the new administration is considering executive orders that would publicize the government's involvement in secret UFO research.
He says a wave of new whistleblowers are set to come forward exposing how they worked on top-secret projects which involved retrieving and back-engineering otherworldly craft.
Dr Greer said: 'With the new president, I've been working with a number of people close to him, encouraging a number of executive orders to launch this sort of investigation, provide whistleblower blower protection, and action.'
He is a retired emergency physician who began working in the 1990s to persuade whistleblowers in the military, government and corporations to come forward.
Dr Greer said: 'The ones I'm working with are waiting to see what the new administration does, what the new Congress does, the way to see if there's lethal or legal push back from these covert operations.
The 'covert operations' Dr Greer refers to are secret groups within the Government which he believes work to prevent the release of information relating to alien technology.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Did you look at any of the papers on that site? They are free.
You'll get what you get. I get "inconclusive."
FRD's mention of "celestial devices" is about a premise, not a fact. It is old-fashioned verbiage of the time. The two words prove people were talking about the subject, not that they prove the subject matter.
The Bush to Truman is "interpreted" by the site owner, " Could this be one hugely classified program called 'Majestic Twelve' at the end of the summer? "
Could this be?
"Unidentified objects?" Mentioning the phrase is not proof. It is proof however that something was UNIDENTIFIED. Still is.
Believe as you will. The "evangelical" fervor presented as truth and testified to as proof byu citing "the Feds" as the cover-up is not the same as opening a warehouse and having a wide-ranging team of scientists hands-on examine physical evidence.
What is clear is that Majestic -- Majic Eyes -- is a product to be sold and an individual to whom to donate money. Please do so, if this moves you so to do.
“He says a wave of new whistleblowers are set to come forward exposing how they worked on top-secret projects which involved retrieving and back-engineering otherworldly craft.”
None of this will ever happen. And the reason it will never happen is very simple, you can’t back-engineer something that doesn’t exist.
I can't argue with that. On the other hand, I did correspond with one who was directly involved.
So, here we sit: Wishing we knew what the heck is going on, but knowing that we probably never will. ;-D
A pity.
But, how do you KNOW they don't exist. We'd love to share your conviction, but see evidence to the contrary.
You need to give up your wishful thinking your just running around a bush wasting time and logic.
What do you base that on?
FACTS you nor anybody else has seen one no clear rigged photos nothing just wishful thinking and a loss of reality call a shrink you need help fast.
Thy will put away if you keep it up.
You keep resorting to strange accusations (like “wishful thinking”) instead of providing a rationale for your belief. If your position is strong, why rely on dismissive remarks rather than reasoned arguments?
Your claim that there is no evidence is a bold one. What is it based on? Millions of people have provided anecdotal accounts. Maybe they were mistaken, hallucinating, or even lying. Or maybe some were correct. But to claim there is no evidence is to ignore their existence altogether.
Some of these people have even testified before Congress on national television. Do you believe they are all fabricating their experiences? If so, why?
Your opinion is as valid as anyone else’s—so let’s hear the reasoning behind it.
There you go again.
Will you solemnly promise to post photographs of your face following a disclosure?
How do you claim to know what others have or haven’t seen? Naval pilots have visually observed UAPs and testified under oath before Congress. Even President Trump met with these pilots and acknowledged the issue as a legitimate air safety concern. Does he need a shrink too?
If you’re confident in your position, you should be able to argue it without resorting to insults. Instead of dismissing the subject out of hand, try actually learning about it.
As I’ve said repeatedly, I don’t claim to know what these things are—I’ve drawn no conclusions. But the crews of the USS Roosevelt, Princeton, Nimitz, Omaha, and many others have documented encounters. If you think they’re all mistaken or lying, explain why.
This is a particularly interesting question. Those who cannot even admit to the possibility that those objects have been seen by countless other people presents a dilemma. How do they believe anything from history? Did they personally meet Ramses, Alexander, or even Jesus? Why do they believe those people existed when only a handful of people who lived thousands of years ago allegedly said so; but, don't believe thousands of credible people living in their own lifetime?
All of history brought to us from outside of our lifetimes is strictly based on the faith in the witnesses; and, those accounts originate with very few people.
Outright rejection of the UFO phenomenon reveals, in my opinion, either abject fear, religious misinterpretation, or simple-mindedness.
Since you have forbidden me to post to you, I assumed the honorable thing for you to do would be to not post to me. Unfortunately I assumed you were perhaps an honorable man. Past is prologue. This was my error.
Not that I mind. Unlike you, I'm willing to discuss and defend my ideas.
Got a picture of Jesus?
You do know they didn’t have photography then right?.
And what would those be?
And show me where I have been unwilling to discuss my ideas?
You need to stop being intellectually dishonest if you want people to take you seriously.
People did personally meet Ramses, Alexander, even Jesus unless all of history is a lie?.
Outright rejection of the UFO is believing someone or many have seen one no records of any type has proven that as a fact.
They are either paid Deep State trolls or just common pests.
If you take a look at the chain of custody of Christ's life's history, it goes through the Catholic Church. That organization has credibility issues going back to its roots.
Explain to me how you choose to apply Faith in one instance, but not the other.
Documented encounters of something they have seen does not give any credence to the fact UFO’s are what they saw many planes have been called UFO’s even the SR71 was called one for a time.
Many aircraft exist that people haven’t seen that’s as close to calling something a UFO as it gets.
Anyone who say other has been talking to Buck Rogers to long and have a Buch Rogers whistle ring to call him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.