How do you claim to know what others have or haven’t seen? Naval pilots have visually observed UAPs and testified under oath before Congress. Even President Trump met with these pilots and acknowledged the issue as a legitimate air safety concern. Does he need a shrink too?
If you’re confident in your position, you should be able to argue it without resorting to insults. Instead of dismissing the subject out of hand, try actually learning about it.
As I’ve said repeatedly, I don’t claim to know what these things are—I’ve drawn no conclusions. But the crews of the USS Roosevelt, Princeton, Nimitz, Omaha, and many others have documented encounters. If you think they’re all mistaken or lying, explain why.
This is a particularly interesting question. Those who cannot even admit to the possibility that those objects have been seen by countless other people presents a dilemma. How do they believe anything from history? Did they personally meet Ramses, Alexander, or even Jesus? Why do they believe those people existed when only a handful of people who lived thousands of years ago allegedly said so; but, don't believe thousands of credible people living in their own lifetime?
All of history brought to us from outside of our lifetimes is strictly based on the faith in the witnesses; and, those accounts originate with very few people.
Outright rejection of the UFO phenomenon reveals, in my opinion, either abject fear, religious misinterpretation, or simple-mindedness.
Documented encounters of something they have seen does not give any credence to the fact UFO’s are what they saw many planes have been called UFO’s even the SR71 was called one for a time.
Many aircraft exist that people haven’t seen that’s as close to calling something a UFO as it gets.
Anyone who say other has been talking to Buck Rogers to long and have a Buch Rogers whistle ring to call him.