Did you look at any of the papers on that site? They are free.
You'll get what you get. I get "inconclusive."
FRD's mention of "celestial devices" is about a premise, not a fact. It is old-fashioned verbiage of the time. The two words prove people were talking about the subject, not that they prove the subject matter.
The Bush to Truman is "interpreted" by the site owner, " Could this be one hugely classified program called 'Majestic Twelve' at the end of the summer? "
Could this be?
"Unidentified objects?" Mentioning the phrase is not proof. It is proof however that something was UNIDENTIFIED. Still is.
Believe as you will. The "evangelical" fervor presented as truth and testified to as proof byu citing "the Feds" as the cover-up is not the same as opening a warehouse and having a wide-ranging team of scientists hands-on examine physical evidence.
What is clear is that Majestic -- Majic Eyes -- is a product to be sold and an individual to whom to donate money. Please do so, if this moves you so to do.