Skip to comments.
Was Elizabeth I really a MAN? Inside the shocking theory that claims the Virgin Queen was a male imposter
Daily Mail ^
| 02-08-2025
| MARIA OKANRENDE and GINA KALSI
Posted on 02/09/2025 4:30:13 AM PST by Adder
Queen Elizabeth I was known to be an all-powerful monarch, a warrior who defeated the Spanish Armada, a leader loved by her subjects and a muse for Shakespeare.
The late Queen of England and Ireland - who ruled from 1558 until her death in 1603 - was so legendary that her reign was officially crowned the Elizabethan era, its very own epoch of the famed Tudor period.
But one rumour has threatened to crack her tenable legacy, leading doubters to ask whether the Virgin Queen was the fiercely independent leader that history claims her to be.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: bisley; bisleyboy; bramstoker; conspiracy; cotswolds; dailymail; elizabeth; elizabethi; gaslighting; genderdysphoria; genderfluid; ginakalsi; girlboss; godsgravesglyphs; grooming; henryviii; homosexualagenda; mariaokanrende; mayday; mayqueen; overcourthouse; queenelizabeth; renaissance; thebisleyboy; thomaskeble; transactivism; transbs; transgender; tudors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Are you kidding me?
What a tale...an amusing read.
1
posted on
02/09/2025 4:30:13 AM PST
by
Adder
To: Adder
So we’ve moved beyond imagining great men in history to all have been gay to great women in history to have been trans?
To: Adder
It’s clickbait.
That’s how the DM makes its money these days.
Hmmmmm, wonder if the DM got any USAID funding...? 🤔
3
posted on
02/09/2025 4:32:09 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away!)
To: Adder
To: Adder
There were no biologists in 1603.
5
posted on
02/09/2025 4:32:25 AM PST
by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: Adder
“Was Elizabeth I really a MAN?”
Seems it’s working for Samantha Power...well until a few days ago.
6
posted on
02/09/2025 4:35:53 AM PST
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: Adder
Just more ridiculousness.
7
posted on
02/09/2025 4:39:13 AM PST
by
exPBRrat
To: Adder
Ridiculous. Her father would have been elated and welcomed her if Elizabeth had actually been male.
8
posted on
02/09/2025 4:39:54 AM PST
by
Governor Dinwiddie
( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and His mercy endureth forever. — Psalm 106)
To: Adder
Well it (if it be) at least did not come out of the closet (so to speak it)
and so impose it on us all! A real edict would have it been.
To: Adder
That artist was not very good with hands.
10
posted on
02/09/2025 4:51:12 AM PST
by
TangoLimaSierra
(⭐⭐To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Violence⭐⭐)
To: TangoLimaSierra
That artist was not very good with hands. Ah, yes. DC Universe.
11
posted on
02/09/2025 4:53:30 AM PST
by
Sirius Lee
("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.")
To: Governor Dinwiddie
Anne Boylen would have kept her head!
To: Adder
Clickbait.
Men were definitely in privileged position then (although not as much as some feminists would make you think), so why would anybody fake to be a woman?!
“Virgin”
She had some male favorites.
Why she not married?
Pretty simple. If she married, she would had to give away some power to her husband, and obviously, she did not want to do that!
Standard problem of almost all female rulers in the past - they had to remain single, if they wanted the absolute power!
13
posted on
02/09/2025 4:56:25 AM PST
by
AZJeep
14
posted on
02/09/2025 4:58:18 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
15
posted on
02/09/2025 4:59:37 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: Adder
Daily Mail has gone Weekly World News on this one.
To: mewzilla
Well, this is Britain.
They’ll probably say he/she was a Muslim, too.
Al-Isabeth.
17
posted on
02/09/2025 5:02:54 AM PST
by
Alas Babylon!
(Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
To: 9YearLurker
So we’ve moved beyond imagining great men in history to all have been gay to great women in history to have been trans? All in attempt to normalize it.
And of course, no feminist outrage. Which is ironic because what it actually does is say that women can't do great things because they're women. It's MEN who actually do it, posing as men.
I know some liberals who are hell bent ion proving women are just as good as men, which is really a tacit admission that they don't think women are.
18
posted on
02/09/2025 5:03:53 AM PST
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus)
To: Adder
Is this the day to post stupid articles?
19
posted on
02/09/2025 5:06:17 AM PST
by
ABStrauss
(I miss Rush!)
To: Adder
Such a stupid notion. It’s not even a “theory,” just a bid for attention.
20
posted on
02/09/2025 5:08:24 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Sounds like a great idea, with the best of intentions. What could possibly go wrong?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson