DeepSeek is built on other peoples work , typical Chinese ,LOL
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs..........
DeepSeek’s AI claims have shaken the world - but not everyone’s convinced
—
Especially Alibaba who claims their AI is far superior to DeepSeek.
One thing is for certain, you will not get an unbiased article from the US press. They will shill for ChatGPT as if their lives depended on it. They know who controls the narrative.
Try this for starters:
Fourteen Impressive Examples that Show Deepseek is Better than ChatGPT
https://greekreporter.com/2025/01/30/deepseek-better-chatgpt/
I can build an AI very easily.
All I need to do is you submit questions to YoYoChat, then my back office program will submit the same question to ChatGPT. I then relay the ChatGPT response to you as my YoYoChat response.
Someone said that when they asked DeepSeek ‘who are you?’, it replied “ChatGPT.”
Hey, did they just steal everyone else’s software then only spend $5.6 million to reassemble it into DeepSeek? That’s more like their modus operandi.
Seems like the perfect False Value scam
Tom’s Guide did a nice comparison with real world examples, though you won’t find CNN or MSNBC covering this. It should be pointed out that if DeepSeek totally copied ChatGPT the answers would come out the same or at least similar.
I tested ChatGPT vs DeepSeek with 7 prompts — here’s the surprising winner
https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/i-tested-chatgpt-vs-deepseek-with-7-prompts-heres-the-surprising-winner
The biggest problem with ChatGBT is they used lowest common denominator and biased sources to train it. No one should be surprised that it spits out answers that are lowest common denominator and biased. The #1 rule of computing still holds true: Garbage in, garbage out.
It is stolen tech. The Chinese think nothing of theft. They couldn’t build an “Eliza” on their own today much less today’s AI.
Every key stroke you make on that function can be read by the Chinese communist party.