Posted on 01/06/2025 8:46:08 AM PST by daniel1212
The Universe is electrically neutral, with one electron to cancel out the charge of every proton in the Universe, and the nuclear forces are extremely short-range, failing to extend beyond the scale of an atomic nucleus.
When it comes to the Universe as a whole, only gravitation matters. The Universe expands at the rate it does throughout its history — and not at a different one — for two reasons alone: our laws of gravity and all the forms of energy that exist in the Universe. If things were slightly different from how they actually are, we wouldn't exist. Here's the science of why. ... Imagine that you came upon a thin, tall, rocky spire here on planet Earth. If you were to place another large rock atop this spire, you would expect it would topple over....When we do find the proverbial boulder balanced in unstable equilibrium, we talk about there being a fine-tuning problem
If we come back to the expanding Universe, that's the situation we find ourselves in: the Universe appears to be enormously fine-tuned.
On the one hand, we have the expansion rate that the Universe had initially, close to the Big Bang. On the other hand, we have the sum total of all the forms of matter and energy that existed at that early time as well, including:
radiation, neutrinos, normal matter, dark matter, antimatter, and dark energy.
A Universe with too much matter-and-energy for its expansion rate will recollapse in short order; a Universe with too little will expand into oblivion before it's possible to even form atoms. Yet not only has our Universe neither recollapsed nor failed to yield atoms, but even today, some 13.8 billion years after the Big Bang, those two sides of the equation appear to be perfectly in balance.....
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
origins
you guys always want to skip that first part
look up singularity and apply the word weasel translator
it means “ nothing “
i understand it just fine.
and as far as ignorant
apparently you are
cuz they have abandoned the THEORY they taught as fact for decades.
professing themselves wise
they became fools
Once you guys thought thr earth was flat.
biological evolution
micro evolution
same same
total b.s. for God haters period.
/-)
typical leftist projection
that was you guys
bible teaches a round earth
both the OT and the NT
wow, your ignorance is deeper than i thought.
Sigh.
No.
“typical leftist projection
that was you guys”
typical leftist projection
that was you guys
Well, not really.
A creator of the universe and all creation stands outside His creation and outside time.
“A creator of the universe and all creation stands outside His creation and outside time.”
Not if his creator created him.
I believe that before God spoke the light into being there was nothing, at least nothing that man could perceive. When God said “Let there be light,” there was light. God continued creating until everything that was created was created.
Who created the Creator? This assumes that the Creator was created. The Creator who created time, space and matter had to exist outside of time, space and matter.
To think about Eternity Past hurts are finite human heads.
The author confuses the concept of the big bang with creation from nothing.
Valid question but this is not Greek mythology.
Exodus 3:14: And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.
Popeye said something similar.
I am what I am and that’s all that I am, IIRC.
“On the other hand, who knows how many times an embryonic “Big Bangs” occurred (with each collapsing back onto itself) before yielding the one that produced our universe?”
The universe existed before the big bang in the form of a plasma.
‘ The universe existed before the big bang in the form of a plasma.’
Lies from the devil.
Before the big bang the was only a Chuck E. Cheese with faulty wiring.
sigh
yes.
read and weep.
Darwin’s Top 10 Arguments Against His Own Theory
Herman B. Bouma
March 29, 2023, 2:59 PM
https://evolutionnews.org/2023/03/darwins-top-10-arguments-against-his-own-theory/
///
where you been fuzy ?
Big Bang Abandoned in New Model of the Universe
A new cosmology successfully explains the accelerating expansion of the universe without dark energy; but only if the universe has no beginning and no end.
By Emerging Technology from the arXivarchive page
July 27, 2010
https://www.technologyreview.com/2010/07/27/201850/big-bang-abandoned-in-new-model-of-the-universe/
\\
LPP Fusion
https://www.lppfusion.com › science
The Scientific Evidence Against the Big Bang
Summary from LPPFusion, Inc.
The contradictions between Big Bang theory predictions and observations are not at all limited to those that have been widely dubbed a “Crisis in Cosmology”. Despite the continuing popularity of the theory, essentially every prediction of the Big Bang theory has been increasingly contradicted by better and better data, as shown by many teams of researchers. The observations are, on the other hand, consistent with a non-expanding universe with no Big Bang. The real crisis in cosmology is that the Big Bang never happened.
\/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.