Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/01/2025 Vol.503, Q Day 2623

Qanon.pub ^ | 01/01/2025 | FReeQs, FReepers, LurQers and Vanity

[little jeremiah]

🌪+++🌪

@01010001

President’s Sworn In Without A Bible:

1: Thomas Jefferson (1801): He did not use a Bible, likely out of commitment to the separation of church and state.

2: John Quincy Adams (1825): He swore on a book of laws, symbolizing his commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law rather than a religious text.

3: Theodore Roosevelt (1901): He was sworn in without a Bible after the assassination of President William McKinley while on vacation; the ceremony was rushed, and no Bible was available.

4: Calvin Coolidge (1923): When Coolidge was sworn in following the death of President Warren G. Harding, his father administered the oath without a Bible, adhering to Puritan ethics which frowned upon using objects as symbols of reverence.

- - -

17: Donald John Trump (2025):

Reason: TBD

[little jeremiah]

I have a theory about the Q drop re: POTUS out of the country. Will post later. Short thing.

[bitt]

https://truthsocial.com/@DanScavino/113862785859486857

Dan Scavino 6 min before Trump goes to the coliseum

(travels with Trump)

[ponygirl]

They just reported on ABC that Gen. Milley’s portrait had been removed from the gallery this morning.

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

In Ex parte Garland, which involved President Andrew Johnson’s pardon of a lawyer who had served in the legislature of the Confederacy, the court indicated that the president’s pardon power covers all federal offenses. The president can issue a pardon at any point after a crime is committed and before, during or after criminal proceedings have taken place. The president cannot, however, pardon someone for future crimes. A pardon covers both the offender’s conviction for the crime and the sentence for that crime.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/333/

In Burdick v. United States, the Supreme Court addressed the case of a newspaper editor who declined to testify before a grand jury, invoking the Fifth Amendment, even after the president pardoned him. Burdick declined to accept the pardon, and he was held in contempt for refusing to testify. The question before the Supreme Court was what effect, if any, the unaccepted pardon had. The court ruled that a pardon becomes effective only if it is accepted. The court also compared immunity, granted by Congress, and a pardon, explaining that the differences are “substantial.” Unlike immunity, the court reasoned, a pardon “carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it.”

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/79/

If they accept the pardon then they are confessing that they committed the crimes. A pardon carries an imputation of guilt.

A President cannot pardon for future crimes. But the President can issue a pardon after the crime has been committed but before criminal proceedings have taken place.

So if they accept the pardon they are admitting that a crime took place, they participated in the crime and are guilty of the crime even though criminal proceedings have not taken place. It does not apply to any crimes they may commit in the future.

Fauci, the “J6” committee, Mary McCord the lawfare queen, the Biden family, General Miley etc, by accepting the pardon are admitting they participated in a crime even though criminal proceedings have not taken place.

Vague, yes, especially since no criminal proceedings, i.e. charges filed stating the crime, have taken place, but they have to admit guilt in order to accept the pardon.

[Keflavik76]

President Trump is not going to let any American, even a traitor like Fauci, be subjected to some international Kangaroo Court.

I don’t think that a preemptive pardon will stand the test of a court room. It would make a mockery of justice.  Fauci will never get out of the woods and next time he appears before congress he will be unable to plea the fifth and if he lies will be subject to penalty. The rest of the world has every right to go after Fauci if they have suffered at his hand.

[OldWarBaby]

—the Senate dithers? They had better not. They’ve long been advised who Trump wants in the top jobs and they had best get crackin’. This is on Thune as I noted way back thread. If he buttslides he can be replaced. Imaginary problems won’t be tolerated. And Pete had best be up soonest. Trump is in position now to quickly apply pain to the districts of un-responsive dunderheads. Hey Snodgrass. Sorry about that highway. It’s gonna be a year late. But I’d really like to get this bill signed to keep it from being two years late? eh? comprenday amigo?

[Bigg Red]

Never heard of Marillion.

[MomwithHope]

.

[Bigg Red]

😉

[bitt]

!!++

[bitt]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/barron-trump-epitomizes-his-parents-class-walks-shake/

....
Despite what the Biden-Harris regime has done to his father and his family, Barron chose class above all else.

Watch:

Barron Trump just approached Biden and Kamala to extend handshakes. WOW. pic.twitter.com/HX2dUy9MAh

— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) January 20, 2025

Nothing says boss move like squaring up to your enemies and looking into their eyes as you hold their hand and bring it towards you.

— Michael Allen (@ElvisKnevil) January 20, 2025

And Melania watching the entire thing closely

She raised a classy kid

— Amy Nixon (@texasrunnerDFW) January 20, 2025

[OldWarBaby]

Melania knows exactly what she’s doing. The wide brim hat is a great touch. She’s been treated so shabbily by the fashionmagdicks that I’m sure she didn’t want to give them a cheap good shot There are probly a half dozen photo freeks who have been offered 5 grand or more if they can produce a clean shot of her during the ceremonies. And she ain’t gonna give it to them-——you go girl and tell them to stuff it for four more years.

And as a private citizen she is gonna sue their asxes off for messing with her clothes drawer at MAL. Different bunch of axholes but you get the drift? Remember that pic of her confabbing with the Queen of Jordan just a couple days ago-—I’ll bet they were strategerizing?

[bitt]

https://x.com/KassyAkiva/status/1881375179018027064?

A guillotine has arrived at the anti-Trump protest in DC

[Publius]

They will play clip this again and again at Barron’s inauguration as president on January 20, 2061.

[Porkchop]

🌪+++🌪

@01010001

President’s Sworn In Without A Bible:

1: Thomas Jefferson (1801): He did not use a Bible, likely out of commitment to the separation of church and state.

2: John Quincy Adams (1825): He swore on a book of laws, symbolizing his commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law rather than a religious text.

3: Theodore Roosevelt (1901): He was sworn in without a Bible after the assassination of President William McKinley while on vacation; the ceremony was rushed, and no Bible was available.

4: Calvin Coolidge (1923): When Coolidge was sworn in following the death of President Warren G. Harding, his father administered the oath without a Bible, adhering to Puritan ethics which frowned upon using objects as symbols of reverence.

- - -

17: Donald John Trump (2025):

Reason: TBD

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There’s that “17” again...

Hmmmm...

🐷

[Bigg Red]

MarQ

[RitaOK]

Could the President’s interest in restoring the McKinley name to the Mount, also include noting that McKinley was the last president to call for returning to the GOLD STANDARD?

Just heard FOX reporter casually drop that item.

How Quey is that! 😁

[thingumbob]

V for vendetta

[fatima]

Very Q.