Posted on 12/31/2024 5:12:18 PM PST by tarpit
Is Congress Sidestepping Its Duties Through Repeated "One-Time" Spending? A Look at the Nondelegation Doctrine.
We've seen a pattern lately: Congress allocates funds for "one-time" emergencies, like COVID relief, but then that spending keeps getting renewed, effectively becoming part of the baseline budget. While flexibility in emergencies is crucial, this practice raises a serious question: Could this be an end-run around the Nondelegation Doctrine?
The Nondelegation Doctrine, rooted in Article I of the Constitution, says that Congress can't simply hand over its legislative powers to the Executive Branch. By repeatedly extending spending that was initially justified as temporary, without robust debate and a clear legislative mandate for *permanent* programs, Congress might be effectively delegating its power of the purse.
Think of it this way: if an emergency spending bill gives an agency broad discretion to spend money on a new program, and that spending is repeatedly renewed without a thorough reevaluation of the program's merits or a specific legislative authorization for its continuation, is Congress truly exercising its legislative power, or is it letting the Executive Branch effectively create and fund programs on an ongoing basis?
While the Nondelegation Doctrine has rarely been used to strike down laws in recent times, some legal scholars argue it's ripe for a revival. Could this pattern of "one-time" spending renewals be the test case? At the very least, it's a practice that deserves more scrutiny and raises concerns about the balance of power between the branches of government. We need to ensure that emergency measures don't become a backdoor for permanent expansions of government power without proper Congressional oversight and a clear legislative mandate.
Important Caveats (and why this is a long shot):
* The Nondelegation Doctrine is largely dormant: Courts have been extremely reluctant to invalidate laws based on this doctrine since the 1930s. * High Bar for Success: A successful challenge would require a very specific set of facts and a compelling legal argument. It would have to overcome the strong presumption of constitutionality that courts afford to Congressional actions. * Political Question: Courts might deem this a "political question" best left to the political branches.
Disclaimer:* This post is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. It raises a complex legal question and is intended to stimulate discussion.
Continuing resolutions began by rolling the stimulus from the Fiscal Crisis into the following year’s spending. That elevated spending became the baseline going forward. Every crisis was an excuse to increase the baseline. From there, they went to infinity and beyond!
This is how the Federal debt increased $26 trillion in 16 years.
Please understand that the scam will keep going at full speed. Trump will fight to raise the “debt ceilimg” and outspend everyone ever, regardless of the toothless DOGE, with the barking support of everyone here and elsewhere.
They succeeded at appointing the MAGA clown and every ‘merican will defend him
I am firmly pro-life so I pray that Trumpy defends life but the rest is business as usual...
Yes, it been derelict in it’s duties for years. Unfortunately stupid voters send 95% of them back every 2 years
Yes. Obviously.
and robbing the taxpayers
Opus?
Remember his last term?
He tried fighting these pork bills once or twice, and eventually gave up.
I doubt there will be any change in spending.
You seem to be misremembering the last term.
There also seems to be a plague of post-election concern trolling.
Have sidebar mod change the title to “duh.” Congress is NOT our friend.
Happy New Year.
😂
What if he said no, I do not need nor authorize the request to have the 1.68 trillion Covid relief to continue to be part of the budget?
They haven’t passed a real budget since Obama
I’m not misremembering anything.
Exactly. So the 1.6+ trillion that was added as a onetime thing for Covid is still being reallocated each year on a CR using baseline budgeting.
aint bin no real budget since i don kno win!
so, yup, it is!
Of course you aren’t. There has been no difference in the state of the USA from when Obama took office until now. Trump will be no different from Biden, of course . . . right?
The $900 billion Obama infrastructure money is still in there too. That’s the Executive branch “fun money” slush fund.
The CR is just a criminal exercise in the theft of the taxpayer’s money...
Every CR ever done has ballooned the National debt via the sneaky pork additions added to every CR...
Both parties line their pockets and those of their cronies via the CR...
It needs to be abolish by law or declared unconstitutional...
“is largely dormant”
NO KIDDING! Author forgot to bring up congress failures to do their job and pass clear laws without passing their legislative duties to alphabet “Agencies” to “Issue implementing regulations”.
Either pass the full law in detail, or DO NOT PASS ANY NEW LAW!
Frankly, all I want to see are laws being repealed, in full.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.