Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing 737-800, the model that crashed in South Korea, is one of the world’s most popular aircraft
CNBC ^ | December 30, 2024 | Leslie Josephs

Posted on 12/30/2024 10:54:52 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2024 10:54:52 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

When you have a bird strike... It doesn’t matter what model number your jet is... It’s coming down.


2 posted on 12/30/2024 10:56:26 AM PST by jerod (Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Oddly this doesn’t make me feel any more secure when I fly. In fact just the opposite. I haven’t flown since 1999. If I can drive that’s what I’ll do thanks.


3 posted on 12/30/2024 11:05:53 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yup, bird strike, no hydraulics...gear up landing, which is survivable except that the plane had no flaps and thrust reversers (landed on the engines)...meaning it slid to the end and hit a barrier. Typical MSNBC “analysis” provided by folks who’d fail a fifth grade science test. And the media wonders why we give the turds in our toilet more regard than we give them. I’m surprise they didn’t let Rachel Maddow give the report, since she is arguably the best liar there.


4 posted on 12/30/2024 11:09:08 AM PST by Da Coyote (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jerod
No. "Bird strikes are a significant threat to airliner safety, with over 13,000 reported incidents annually in the United States alone." "...bird strikes rarely cause fatal crashes".

source:
https://search.brave.com/search?q=air+liner+bird+strikes&source=desktop&summary=1&conversation=e9ee9375054c174324fed5

5 posted on 12/30/2024 11:10:05 AM PST by WhoisAlanGreenspan? (GO LIONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

“no hydraulics”

The bird strike will not take out hydraulics. Raising flaps after the bird strike indicates they still had hydraulics.
The smooth control on landing indicates they had hydraulics.


6 posted on 12/30/2024 11:19:26 AM PST by TexasGator (/'1/11111)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The media are stupid. Originally claiming this as the worst Korean air disaster, now edited to saying “in decades” because they want us to forget the Soviet Evil Empire killing 269 people aboard Korean Air 007 in 1983.
.
Bonus points for those who remember the impact on Reagan’s handling of the situation.


7 posted on 12/30/2024 11:33:41 AM PST by sturmde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Some investor group needs to buy Boeing and take it private long enough to clean out the DEI people and completely restructure it where necessary...and then bring it public again.

Here are the reasons I suggest that strategy:

Operational Flexibility:

As a private company, Boeing's new management/owners could make bold, long-term decisions without the constant pressure of quarterly earnings and shareholder expectations. Restructuring efforts will involve moves that will be unpopular with some public shareholders, like cost-cutting, gutting the DEI/Woke people, and divesting non-core business units.

Focus on Core Issues:

A private environment allows management to concentrate on fixing critical operational and cultural problems (e.g., quality control, safety standards, supply chain issues) without distractions from public scrutiny.

Simplified Capital Raising and Restructuring:

A private equity investor or consortium could provide the needed capital to overhaul Boeing's operations without having to explain their turnaround efforts to the public markets.


8 posted on 12/30/2024 11:37:14 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson paraphrased, "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
...meaning it slid to the end and hit a barrier.

What idiot puts a solid concrete barrier close to a runway???

9 posted on 12/30/2024 11:37:14 AM PST by null and void (Regarding the second Trump presidency, everyone who isn’t terrified is thankful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jerod

I’ve seen a C-130 eat a pelican and keep flying...


10 posted on 12/30/2024 11:45:14 AM PST by Parity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

What is “close to?” I remember blast walls not far from runways. They’re supposed to divert energy and debris from explosions upwards. What might have been on the other side of the barrier?


11 posted on 12/30/2024 11:46:47 AM PST by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. the )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void

What idiot puts a solid concrete barrier close to a runway???

~~~

An idiot that wants to protect the civilian infrastructure that exists beyond that point?

That’s just pure speculation on my part though, because if there isn’t anything like a residential neighborhood or a chemical storage plant on the other side of that runway, then you are right, that wall never should have been there.


12 posted on 12/30/2024 11:48:38 AM PST by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: z3n

It didn’t crash into the wall. It crashed into the ILS structure.


13 posted on 12/30/2024 11:52:13 AM PST by TexasGator (/'1/11111)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
It crashed into the ILS structure.

Which is perversely ironic.

14 posted on 12/30/2024 11:52:59 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gundog

“I remember blast walls not far from runways. They’re supposed to divert energy and debris from explosions upwards.”

To divert jet engine blast.


15 posted on 12/30/2024 11:53:41 AM PST by TexasGator (/'1/11111)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xp38

It is the most popular aircraft, but you must know how to fly it. Vid shows the aircraft touched down at Ref plus 120 kts without a foamed runway. Captain should have landed at Ref or lower with a foamed runway and most pax should have walked away without injury. Next issue is why the concrete abutment on end of chosen runway?


16 posted on 12/30/2024 11:57:46 AM PST by chopperk (airhig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“no hydraulics”

“The bird strike will not take out hydraulics. Raising flaps after the bird strike indicates they still had hydraulics.
The smooth control on landing indicates they had hydraulics.

Raising flaps whilst on landing approach? I believe was the case. Could be wrong. However, a hit on one engine shouldn’t take out redundant hydraulics. However, I never flew the airliner types...’twas the fast stuff that could pull Gs and cause excitement.


17 posted on 12/30/2024 11:59:36 AM PST by Da Coyote (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

And exploding ordnance, in an accident. Think 12 foot tall concrete Jersey barriers. I’m thinking of the Alert Pad, at Homestead AFB. I wonder if S. Korea has military alert launch capability from that airport. I know that Portland International had Oregon Air National Guard jets that launched from there. Seems like launch sites might be at a premium in SK


18 posted on 12/30/2024 12:00:22 PM PST by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. the )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

pilot sabotage.


19 posted on 12/30/2024 12:01:02 PM PST by knarf (Ther )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

The turds have more substance than Rachel.


20 posted on 12/30/2024 12:02:03 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again," )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson