Posted on 12/11/2024 5:38:05 AM PST by MtnClimber
Put simply:
Before anyone is pardoned for a crime or crimes, shouldn’t the crime(s) be disclosed to the American people?
I understand that the power to pardon is enshrined in the Constitution, but where in the Constitution does it say that the crime that is pardoned shall remain undisclosed to the American people?
The requirement that the crimes be disclosed before they are pardoned should be made law. There is nothing in the Constitution of which I am aware that prevents this requirement for transparency from being made law.
Why would anyone oppose such a law?
Constitutional scholars please put forth your views on this issue.
Challenge the pardons in court. Declare Biden is legally incompetent. Then the Biden pardon signatures become worthless.
Telling a lawyer that "X" can commit crimes without legal consequences hits them all right in the breadbasket. They'll never stand for it.
Yes you can.
None that I know of, Why?
I should have specified that I wasn’t talking about JSixers. I thought everyone knew they weren’t guilty of any crimes. I was talking about the extreme far-left turd rollers requesting pardons.
Exactly ... they’ve been “convicted” of non-crimes, so how do you pardon them? Their records need to be expunged, and they need to be indemnified for their losses.
However that works ...
Is the Supreme Court up to it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.