How Can We ‘Trust The Science’ When We Can’t Trust The Data?

Issues & Insights ^ | 14 Nov, 2024 | I & I Editorial Board

[MtnClimber]

Global cooling, global warming and now climate change. They were always a hoax to justify the government control of the means of production.

[butlerweave]

Their climate crisis is not based on science but FAKE science

[Rockingham]

Bad data, fraudulent data, poor study design, and various forms of bias and error are major problems in science. The term “replication crisis” is now often used in medicine and the life sciences for the frequent inability to replicate study data and results.

[PeterPrinciple]

Global cooling, global warming and now climate change. They were always a hoax to justify the government control of the means of production.

---

They need a manufactured crises to have any reason for being.

[MtnClimber]

They need a manufactured crises to have any reason for being.

It is called "The Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis".

[Brian Griffin]

My block here in Florida has probably lost 70% of its trees due to affluent newcomers cutting them down and hurricanes knocking them down.

It is warmer.

Hurricane Milton blew off almost all the leaves. The leaves are now mainly back. My yard now has cool places.

[Brian Griffin]

Pie Chart of CO2 emissions by country:

[MtnClimber]

Thanks, that is an informative chart.

[OHPatriot]

The fact that “data” is being faked doesn’t surprise me at all. What surprises me is that it’s only around 30%.

30 years ago I used to design very large facility HVAC systems. Tons and tons of calculations to design flows in the right areas. We “required” the balance teams to provide a balance report at end of construction. AMAZING how all numbers lined up. Pencil Whipping is nothing new. Numbers that look too good to be true USUALLY ARE!!!!

[marktwain]

The term “replication crisis” is now often used in medicine and the life sciences for the frequent inability to replicate study data and results.

It is very real. "Science" has become a moniker to justify ideological screeds designed to influence policy, not to find objective truth.

I call it "Scientism", or use of the term and forms of science to pursue influence and goals.

Climate alarmism is one of the most sucessful of these schemes.

[Qwapisking]

if the so-called “experts” can’t do the math on something as simple as chromosomes, where the number of combinations normally results in a XY or XX...what other areas of science are affected by the inability to do simple math?

[Montana_Sam]

The current climate "model" is wrong. So, problems that are factually falsely defined can never be solved logically.
Anybody who claims that the earth's atmosphere effects climate change is operating from a false premise. And we're not even considering the idiotic claim that a trace gas (CO₂) is capable of causing the claimed climate change.
Until honest physicists step in and fix the erroneous model, the liars will continue to scare the bejeezuz out of the scientifically ignorant masses.

[Bob434]

It has been revealed that over 90% of the data col,ection devices were placed in extra hot zones like nearly paved parking lots, next to electric motors like air conditioners, etc-

Their satellite data showed no warming for 18 years, so what did they do? Yup, they CHEATED! They claimed that one of their satellites was “out of position:, so they discarded all the data from it and INVENTED new results which they THOUGHT IT SHOULD HAVE READ”, and viola, they got their warming for those 18 years-

If the left are willing to intentionally skew readings and results like that, then they can’t be trusted to be the representatives of legitimate science!

[butlerweave]

The idiots in the picture want money so they can buy more from the companies that they’re saying causes their climate crisis ,LOL

[eyeamok]

What does Real Data, Facts and Science have to do with an emotional argument based on a religious belief????

[FlingWingFlyer]

That picture perfectly portrays the scam that "climate change" is. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. NOTHING BUT THE MONEY FOR THE LITTLE PIGGIES.

In a related story for all my former fellow Scientific American readers, the editor in chief, the lardass Laura Helmuth has stepped down after the pig went on an anti-Trump ramp calling us #@!?$$%$@! It caused her to experience a backlash landslide of her own. She says she's going to go birdwatching. That probably pays really good. Adios! Fatass!

[FlingWingFlyer]

ramp = rampage

[EBH]

The phrase, ‘trust the science,’ is their way of saying you are too stupid to question the science, they can’t explain.

[Rockingham]

Even worse than climate alarmism is the poor quality of much medical research. Drug companies looking to pursue new leads based on published studies have learned not to trust them but to run replication studies. Often, what has been published fails.