Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/16/2024 6:14:19 AM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

Global cooling, global warming and now climate change. They were always a hoax to justify the government control of the means of production.


2 posted on 11/16/2024 6:15:19 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Their climate crisis is not based on science but FAKE science


3 posted on 11/16/2024 6:20:08 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Bad data, fraudulent data, poor study design, and various forms of bias and error are major problems in science. The term “replication crisis” is now often used in medicine and the life sciences for the frequent inability to replicate study data and results.


4 posted on 11/16/2024 6:20:40 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

My block here in Florida has probably lost 70% of its trees due to affluent newcomers cutting them down and hurricanes knocking them down.

It is warmer.

Hurricane Milton blew off almost all the leaves. The leaves are now mainly back. My yard now has cool places.


7 posted on 11/16/2024 6:24:44 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
Pie Chart of CO2 emissions by country:

8 posted on 11/16/2024 6:27:19 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

if the so-called “experts” can’t do the math on something as simple as chromosomes, where the number of combinations normally results in a XY or XX...what other areas of science are affected by the inability to do simple math?


12 posted on 11/16/2024 6:37:51 AM PST by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
The current climate "model" is wrong. So, problems that are factually falsely defined can never be solved logically.
Anybody who claims that the earth's atmosphere effects climate change is operating from a false premise. And we're not even considering the idiotic claim that a trace gas (CO2) is capable of causing the claimed climate change.
Until honest physicists step in and fix the erroneous model, the liars will continue to scare the bejeezuz out of the scientifically ignorant masses.
13 posted on 11/16/2024 6:44:43 AM PST by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

It has been revealed that over 90% of the data col,ection devices were placed in extra hot zones like nearly paved parking lots, next to electric motors like air conditioners, etc-

Their satellite data showed no warming for 18 years, so what did they do? Yup, they CHEATED! They claimed that one of their satellites was “out of position:, so they discarded all the data from it and INVENTED new results which they THOUGHT IT SHOULD HAVE READ”, and viola, they got their warming for those 18 years-

If the left are willing to intentionally skew readings and results like that, then they can’t be trusted to be the representatives of legitimate science!


14 posted on 11/16/2024 6:46:19 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

The idiots in the picture want money so they can buy more from the companies that they’re saying causes their climate crisis ,LOL


15 posted on 11/16/2024 7:16:54 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

What does Real Data, Facts and Science have to do with an emotional argument based on a religious belief????


16 posted on 11/16/2024 7:21:30 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
That picture perfectly portrays the scam that "climate change" is. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. NOTHING BUT THE MONEY FOR THE LITTLE PIGGIES.

In a related story for all my former fellow Scientific American readers, the editor in chief, the lardass Laura Helmuth has stepped down after the pig went on an anti-Trump ramp calling us #@!?$$%$@! It caused her to experience a backlash landslide of her own. She says she's going to go birdwatching. That probably pays really good. Adios! Fatass!

17 posted on 11/16/2024 7:21:39 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Jamaicans Haitians and Indians used to run motels and 7-11s. Now,they run Congress and the judiciary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

The phrase, ‘trust the science,’ is their way of saying you are too stupid to question the science, they can’t explain.


19 posted on 11/16/2024 7:33:48 AM PST by EBH (America Blackmailed, The True Story of the World War...Coming Soon (1/21-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

The lied about a virus and the “cure” and destroyed the economy. Why would I trust the government about anything.


21 posted on 11/16/2024 8:59:00 AM PST by wgmalabama (Screw Ukraine, screw Russia, screw the west. The only thing that matters is money at this point. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
,,, here's a clip along the same lines from downunder. NIWA is the government agency dealing with weather and environment...,,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEl5WEudZtc

22 posted on 11/16/2024 10:24:07 AM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
"“They (weather stations) are physically gone — but still report data — like magic,” according to Lt. Col. John Shewchuk, a certified consulting meteorologist. “NOAA fabricates temperature data for more than 30% of the 1,218 USHCN reporting stations that no longer exist.”

If 30% is made up data you can make the global trend line say any damn thing you want. That is what they are doing. Satellite data does not support the theory of global warning so what did they do. They "adjusted" the data because they decided the satellite was sending erroneous data due to not being calibrated properly. Voila it now showed global warming was real. The left has corrupted scientific research.

23 posted on 11/16/2024 11:54:49 AM PST by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson