Posted on 11/14/2024 10:46:31 AM PST by TigerClaws
U.S. House Oversight Committee holds a hearing on reports of “unidentified anomalous phenomena” (UFOs), with testimonies expected from former Department of Defense and NASA members.
A Vegas tv local channel coverage that may be of interest:
https://youtu.be/6agNLC8bAns?si=Gah0J1_2Uhp_RvRb
The way some of these objects fly is the exact same way that Bob Lazar stated years ago. That the saucer tilts up and moves forward. As filmed by the naval aviator and released last year.
That the craft is able to create a gravitational field around it. By doing this is can move at much high velocity and not subject the occupants to the G forces that would kill them.
The gravitational field uses an element on the periodic table that the scientific community did not believe existed until just a few years ago.
The Princeton picked the object up at 80,000 ft because that was the upper limit of its radar. This suggests that the object was coming in from a higher altitude.
That's exactly what the kids at the Ariel School incident in Zimbabwe said—the UFO leaned over on its side when it moved away.
Pretty lethal to any organisms we know about.
Here’s the math:
First, let’s convert our units to consistent measures:
Initial height: 80,000 ft = 24,384 meters
Time: 7/8 = 0.875 seconds
Speed: 60,000 mph = 26,822 m/s
Assuming this is happening near sea level and the object reaches the water, the key is to find the acceleration.
Using the equations of motion:
Final velocity: 26,822 m/s
Initial velocity: Let’s assume it starts from the stated speed
Distance: 24,384 m
Time: 0.875 s
The average acceleration would be:
a = (v₂ - v₁)/t
In this case, we’re primarily looking at vertical acceleration against gravity
The change in vertical velocity over this distance in 0.875 seconds
This gives us approximately 27,867 m/s²
To convert to G-forces:
1 G = 9.81 m/s²
27,867/9.81 = approximately 2,841 G’s
This level of G-force would be catastrophic for any living organisms. For context, trained fighter pilots can typically handle up to 9 G’s for very brief periods with special equipment. Even advanced mechanical systems would face extreme stress under such forces.
I believe the skeptic on here are left saying the military personnel who testified under oath are lying the the videos are faked. Right?
Anyone got a link to the report?
Pentagon says UFO nearly crashed into commercial airliner above New York - as bombshell report is released
Oh, and another nut testified before Congress...
Navy Rear Admiral to give bombshell testimony to Congress about underwater UFOs that have been tailing US nuclear subs
Absolutely.
It has been suggested that UFOs might be a form of image projection with a unique kind of mass or substance. This projection could exist primarily in another dimension, intersecting with ours just enough to give it a perceived material presence (solid enough to appear on radar and/or even leave burn marks on the soil). This idea becomes easier to grasp when we remember that what we think of as solid objects are actually collections of atoms bound by electronic forces.
If something from another dimension could manifest similarly—through energy or atomic-like structure—it might give the impression of a tangible, physical object without being one in the conventional sense.
This also offers a possible explanation for why such an object could appear to endure extreme G-forces without destruction; as a projection, it wouldn’t experience forces in the same way a solid object would, allowing it to move or maneuver rapidly without the structural damage we’d expect in physical matter. Additionally, the beings (grays and even mantis-type beings, et al.) seen around these phenomena might not actually be within the projected 'craft.' Instead, they may step through from this other dimension, appearing alongside or even within these projections in a way that gives the illusion of occupancy. This could suggest that the entire experience—craft and beings alike—is part of a dimensional phenomenon that only partially intersects with our reality, creating a perception of material presence without true physicality.
See post #25 for the new Daily Mail story.
Thx. Will do.
Ways (aside from new physics) to get around the physics issues:
—Artificial intelligence vehicles (no passengers)
—Avatars/holograms that are not true biologics (the actual aliens could be “broadcasting” from elsewhere (or elsewhen!).
So this isn't going to get solved anytime soon nor is it important. What IS important is focus HARD on the immense issues right now, since we have the greatest opportunity in the last 80 years to fix serious problems that affect the existence of the nation. In the meantime, the LGM's who fly tic-tacs will not affect much of anything on their sight seeing tours, if that's what these events are.
“So this isn’t going to get solved anytime soon nor is it important. What IS important is focus HARD on the immense issues right now, since we have the greatest opportunity in the last 80 years to fix serious problems that affect the existence of the nation. In the meantime, the LGM’s who fly tic-tacs will not affect much of anything on their sight seeing tours, if that’s what these events are.”
You assume we can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. I can... Can you? And it is important. If civilian corporate contractors are withholding tech from the world, that tech could render all the other international relations and conflict issues pointless because we would be in a new realm of understanding and capability.
For some reason you are working real hard to prevent objectivity about this topic when you could have just ignored it if you don’t believe it possible.
Having a technology is one thing. Knowing what to do with it or how it works is another.
Kind of like a dog with a car ... They can get in and ride around and they know it brings humans to them.
Object was tracked at point A then reaquired at point B at 10 miles which is a rather large FOV. You have time and distance which gives you speed.
F-18 radars (like most radars) can track multiple targets at one time so losing a target and then requiring the same target in the same FOV happens often... Like a tracked aircraft goes behind a mountain, track is lost, the reaquired when it emerges from the other side.
As for speeds, the Mass Solar Probe became the fastest human-made object ever recorded on Sept. 27 2023, the probe reached 394,736 mph/ (635,266 km/h) as it came close to the sun’s surface, thanks to a little gravity assistance from a close flyby of Venus on Aug. 21 2023 . With this approach to the sun, the probe smashed its own previous speed record of 364,660 mph (586,863 kmh), set in Nov. 2021.
So humans have figured out how to achieve these speeds with a little creativity.
Elizondo..is a biologist? You should look at his resume which is pretty impressive.
Your bottom line assumes our understanding of known physics.
Why limit yourself. There’s more we don’t know than know.
Amazing how fast folks will react to plain physics with all kinds of made-up fantasy.
So, if we’re going to get imaginative, how about: Tic-tacs, orbs, etc. - they all look a whole lot like Easter Eggs.
All these ‘observations’ and ‘readings’ and ‘measurements’ come from software-driven displays and equipment. Software - more believable that a good proportion of these unexplained oddities are software/hardware glitches and anomalies.
And for all this rando high-speed movement, not one physical contact or trace of contact.
Gonna have to catch the Bigfoot before it’s credible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.