Pretty lethal to any organisms we know about.
Here’s the math:
First, let’s convert our units to consistent measures:
Initial height: 80,000 ft = 24,384 meters
Time: 7/8 = 0.875 seconds
Speed: 60,000 mph = 26,822 m/s
Assuming this is happening near sea level and the object reaches the water, the key is to find the acceleration.
Using the equations of motion:
Final velocity: 26,822 m/s
Initial velocity: Let’s assume it starts from the stated speed
Distance: 24,384 m
Time: 0.875 s
The average acceleration would be:
a = (v₂ - v₁)/t
In this case, we’re primarily looking at vertical acceleration against gravity
The change in vertical velocity over this distance in 0.875 seconds
This gives us approximately 27,867 m/s²
To convert to G-forces:
1 G = 9.81 m/s²
27,867/9.81 = approximately 2,841 G’s
This level of G-force would be catastrophic for any living organisms. For context, trained fighter pilots can typically handle up to 9 G’s for very brief periods with special equipment. Even advanced mechanical systems would face extreme stress under such forces.
I believe the skeptic on here are left saying the military personnel who testified under oath are lying the the videos are faked. Right?
Absolutely.
It has been suggested that UFOs might be a form of image projection with a unique kind of mass or substance. This projection could exist primarily in another dimension, intersecting with ours just enough to give it a perceived material presence (solid enough to appear on radar and/or even leave burn marks on the soil). This idea becomes easier to grasp when we remember that what we think of as solid objects are actually collections of atoms bound by electronic forces.
If something from another dimension could manifest similarly—through energy or atomic-like structure—it might give the impression of a tangible, physical object without being one in the conventional sense.
This also offers a possible explanation for why such an object could appear to endure extreme G-forces without destruction; as a projection, it wouldn’t experience forces in the same way a solid object would, allowing it to move or maneuver rapidly without the structural damage we’d expect in physical matter. Additionally, the beings (grays and even mantis-type beings, et al.) seen around these phenomena might not actually be within the projected 'craft.' Instead, they may step through from this other dimension, appearing alongside or even within these projections in a way that gives the illusion of occupancy. This could suggest that the entire experience—craft and beings alike—is part of a dimensional phenomenon that only partially intersects with our reality, creating a perception of material presence without true physicality.
Ways (aside from new physics) to get around the physics issues:
—Artificial intelligence vehicles (no passengers)
—Avatars/holograms that are not true biologics (the actual aliens could be “broadcasting” from elsewhere (or elsewhen!).
Amazing how fast folks will react to plain physics with all kinds of made-up fantasy.
So, if we’re going to get imaginative, how about: Tic-tacs, orbs, etc. - they all look a whole lot like Easter Eggs.
All these ‘observations’ and ‘readings’ and ‘measurements’ come from software-driven displays and equipment. Software - more believable that a good proportion of these unexplained oddities are software/hardware glitches and anomalies.
And for all this rando high-speed movement, not one physical contact or trace of contact.
Gonna have to catch the Bigfoot before it’s credible.